forgetDelete a previously stored memory by key. Use when context is stale, the task is done, or you want to clear sensitive data the agent saved earlier. Pair with remember and recall.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| key | Yes | Memory key to delete |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description confirms the destructive nature ('Delete'), which aligns with the destructiveHint=true annotation. It adds little beyond the annotation, only hinting at the use case for clearing sensitive data, but does not contradict annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with two sentences, no wasted words, and front-loads the core purpose ('Delete a previously stored memory by key').
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has only one parameter, no output schema, and annotations covering destructive and idempotent hints, the description is complete. It explains the purpose, when to use it, and references sibling tools for context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema covers 100% of the single parameter with a description for 'key'. The description repeats 'by key' without adding format or additional constraints, so it meets the baseline but adds no extra value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the resource ('a previously stored memory by key'), which is specific and distinct from siblings like 'remember' and 'recall'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It explicitly states when to use the tool ('when context is stale, the task is done, or you want to clear sensitive data'), providing clear context. However, it does not specify when not to use it or give alternatives beyond mentioning sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Several tool clusters overlap heavily: ask_pipeworx, ask_pipeworx_beta, and ask_pipeworx_grounded are near-identical in purpose, and the five polymarket_* tools all target prediction-market analysis. The presence of a broad Pipeworx data layer alongside Wayback-specific tools under one server name further blurs boundaries.
Most tools use snake_case, but the pattern varies: many follow verb_noun (get_snapshot, list_snapshots, resolve_entity, validate_claim), while others are noun_noun (entity_profile, polymarket_edges, pipeworx_feedback, bet_research). Suffixes like _beta and _grounded are used inconsistently, and some names are long and descriptive while others are terse.
34 tools is far more than what a Wayback Machine server should need, and most tools (Pipeworx data queries, prediction-market analysis, memory, subscriptions) have nothing to do with the Wayback Machine. The server's stated purpose appears narrow, but the tool set is bloated with unrelated functionality.
For the Wayback Machine domain, only three tools are relevant (get_capture_count, get_snapshot, list_snapshots), and obvious operations like saving/archiving a URL, comparing snapshots, or handling deleted captures are missing. The Pipeworx-related tools are broad but not clearly aligned with the Wayback theme, so the core purpose is under-served.