Skip to main content
Glama

Valorant

by io.github.pipeworx-io
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Remember

remember
Idempotent

Save data the agent will need to reuse later — across this conversation or across sessions. Use when you discover something worth carrying forward (a resolved ticker, a target address, a user preference, a research subject) so you don't have to look it up again. Stored as a key-value pair scoped by your identifier. Authenticated users get persistent memory; anonymous sessions retain memory for 24 hours. Pair with recall to retrieve later, forget to delete.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
kNoAlias for key.
vNoAlias for value.
keyYesMemory key (e.g., "subject_property", "target_ticker", "user_preference"). Accepts name, k, label as aliases.
dataNoAlias for value.
nameNoAlias for key.
textNoAlias for value.
labelNoAlias for key.
valueYesValue to store (any text — findings, addresses, preferences, notes). Accepts content, text, data, v as aliases; a non-string value is stored as JSON.
contentNoAlias for value.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed10 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / examples
      Added value: +[
+  {
+    "key": "target_ticker",
+    "value": "AAPL"
+  }
+]
    • addedInput schema / properties / content
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Alias for value.",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / data
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Alias for value.",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / k
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Alias for key.",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • changedInput schema / properties / key / description
      Previous value: -"Memory key (e.g., \"subject_property\", \"target_ticker\", \"user_preference\")"New value: +"Memory key (e.g., \"subject_property\", \"target_ticker\", \"user_preference\"). Accepts name, k, label as aliases."
    • addedInput schema / properties / label
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Alias for key.",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / name
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Alias for key.",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / text
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Alias for value.",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / v
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Alias for value.",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • changedInput schema / properties / value / description
      Previous value: -"Value to store (any text — findings, addresses, preferences, notes)"New value: +"Value to store (any text — findings, addresses, preferences, notes). Accepts content, text, data, v as aliases; a non-string value is stored as JSON."
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the description adds useful extra context: memory is scoped by identifier, authenticated users get persistence, and anonymous sessions retain memory for 24 hours. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact, front-loaded with the core purpose, and every sentence adds value: usage trigger, storage model, persistence behavior, and related tools. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple write-tool nature, the absence of an output schema is not a serious gap. The description covers what to store, when to store it, persistence limits, and sibling operations. A marginally stronger version would state return behavior or overwrite semantics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents the key/value aliases and examples. The description only restates the key-value concept without adding deeper semantics, so it meets but does not exceed the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Save data the agent will need to reuse later.' It clearly differentiates itself from sibling tools by naming recall (retrieve) and forget (delete), so an agent can tell which operation to invoke.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an explicit trigger condition: 'Use when you discover something worth carrying forward...' and lists concrete examples. It does not state when not to use it, but the guidance is clear enough for most cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Valorant toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources