Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With a full input schema, output schema, and annotations (readOnly, openWorld, idempotent), the description covers all necessary context: input types, automatic expansion, and historical count behavior. It is complete for a single-parameter lookup tool, anticipating likely user confusions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.