Skip to main content
Glama

Cells In Area

cells_in_area
Read-onlyIdempotent

List cell towers inside a bounding box. Bounding box format: "lat_sw,lon_sw,lat_ne,lon_ne". OpenCellID caps results per call — narrow the bbox if you need detail.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
mccNoRestrict to a country (Mobile Country Code)
mncNoRestrict to a network within MCC
bboxYesBounding box "lat_sw,lon_sw,lat_ne,lon_ne"
limitNoMax records (default 1000, server-capped)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bboxYesBounding box used in query
cellsYesList of cell towers in area
countYesNumber of cell towers found

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "bbox": "37.7749,-122.4194,37.8049,-122.3894"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "bbox": "37.7749,-122.4194,37.8049,-122.3894",
      +    "limit": 500,
      +    "mcc": 310,
      +    "mnc": 410
      +  }
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "bbox": {
      +      "description": "Bounding box used in query",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "cells": {
      +      "description": "List of cell towers in area",
      +      "items": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "avg_signal_strength": {
      +            "description": "Average signal strength",
      +            "type": [
      +              "number",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "cell_id": {
      +            "description": "Cell ID",
      +            "type": [
      +              "number",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "created_at": {
      +            "description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of creation",
      +            "type": [
      +              "string",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "lac": {
      +            "description": "Location Area Code",
      +            "type": [
      +              "number",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "latitude": {
      +            "description": "Cell tower latitude",
      +            "type": [
      +              "number",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "longitude": {
      +            "description": "Cell tower longitude",
      +            "type": [
      +              "number",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "mcc": {
      +            "description": "Mobile Country Code",
      +            "type": [
      +              "number",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "mnc": {
      +            "description": "Mobile Network Code",
      +            "type": [
      +              "number",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "radio": {
      +            "description": "Radio type (GSM/UMTS/LTE/CDMA)",
      +            "type": [
      +              "string",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "range_m": {
      +            "description": "Cell tower coverage range in meters",
      +            "type": [
      +              "number",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "samples": {
      +            "description": "Number of samples collected",
      +            "type": [
      +              "number",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "updated_at": {
      +            "description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of last update",
      +            "type": [
      +              "string",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "mcc",
      +          "mnc",
      +          "lac",
      +          "cell_id",
      +          "radio",
      +          "latitude",
      +          "longitude",
      +          "range_m",
      +          "samples",
      +          "avg_signal_strength",
      +          "created_at",
      +          "updated_at"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "count": {
      +      "description": "Number of cell towers found",
      +      "type": "number"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "bbox",
      +    "count",
      +    "cells"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint. The description adds that results are capped by OpenCellID, a behavioral trait not covered by annotations. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences that front-load the purpose and format, then add a critical limitation. No unnecessary words—every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, the description sufficiently explains the tool's operation and limitations. Could mention pagination or response structure, but not required.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already describes all parameters. The description reiterates the bbox format and adds context on caps, but does not significantly enhance parameter understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List' and resource 'cell towers' with a bounding box. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_cell' which retrieves a single cell, and other unrelated tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides guidance on narrowing the bounding box due to server-side caps, but does not explicitly state when to use versus alternatives like 'get_cell'. The context about caps is helpful for effective use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Several tools are near-indistinguishable by role: ask_pipeworx and ask_pipeworx_beta are documented as currently identical, and ask_pipeworx, ask_pipeworx_grounded, and deep_research overlap as lookup/research entry points. The six-tool Polymarket cluster and the suggest_questions/discover_tools pair add further boundary confusion despite very long descriptions.

Naming Consistency3/5

Snake_case is used consistently, and clusters like ask_pipeworx_* and polymarket_* have internal consistency. However, the global convention is mixed: verb_object names (get_cell, resolve_entity, unsubscribe) sit beside noun phrases (entity_profile, recent_changes, cells_in_area) and product-prefixed nouns (pipeworx_feedback, polymarket_edges), so tool names are not predictable from function.

Tool Count2/5

33 tools is too many for a server named Opencellid, especially since only get_cell and cells_in_area actually belong to the cell-tower domain. Even as a broader Pipeworx/data bundle, the set is heavy and includes unrelated one-offs like generate_llms_txt and scan_dependency.

Completeness2/5

For an OpenCellID server, the surface is just two lookups, missing coverage stats, operator-based search, and other natural cell-tower operations. If judged instead as a Pipeworx data-research suite, coverage is broad, but the lack of a coherent stated domain makes obvious gaps and dead ends harder to identify.