Skip to main content
Glama

Movie Reviews

movie_reviews
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search New York Times movie reviews. Optionally filter by query or critics picks. Returns title, summary, byline, publication date, and URL. Example: movie_reviews({ query: "dune", critics_pick: true })

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNoSearch query — movie title or keyword (optional).
_apiKeyNoOptional — your own NYT API key for higher limits; omit to use the shared Pipeworx key.
critics_pickNoIf true, only return reviews flagged as NYT Critics’ Picks (optional).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "critics_pick": true,
      +    "query": "dune"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "query": "oppenheimer"
      +  }
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate safe read-only behavior. The description adds value by listing return fields (title, summary, byline, publication date, URL) and includes an example, providing useful context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences plus an example, front-loaded with the action. Every word serves a purpose, and the example illustrates usage efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema, the description explicitly lists return fields. The input schema is fully documented, and the description provides a complete overview of what the tool does, its optional parameters, and a usage example.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

While the schema already covers all three parameters (100% coverage), the description provides a concise summary of their purpose and an example usage, which aids understanding without repeating schema details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Search' and the resource 'New York Times movie reviews'. It specifies optional filters (query or critics picks) and provides an example, making the tool's purpose unambiguous and distinct from broader search tools like 'search_articles'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly conveys the tool's scope (movie reviews) with optional filters, but does not explicitly state when to avoid this tool or mention alternative tools. The context is clear enough for appropriate selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.