forgetDelete a previously stored memory by key. Use when context is stale, the task is done, or you want to clear sensitive data the agent saved earlier. Pair with remember and recall.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| key | Yes | Memory key to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds value by explaining the action as 'delete' and 'clear sensitive data', confirming the destructive nature without contradiction.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Three sentences, all essential and front-loaded with the action. No redundancy or filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a one-parameter tool with annotations and a clear schema, the description sufficiently covers purpose, usage, and pairing. No gaps remain.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the parameter description 'Memory key to delete' is already clear. The description does not add extra semantic meaning beyond referencing 'by key', so it meets the baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'previously stored memory by key'. It is distinct from the sibling tools 'remember' and 'recall' implicitly by specifying deletion vs. storage vs. retrieval.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides specific scenarios for use: stale context, task completion, clearing sensitive data. It does not explicitly state when not to use or name alternatives, but the context is clear and helpful.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Several clusters overlap: ask_pipeworx, ask_pipeworx_beta, ask_pipeworx_grounded, deep_research, and validate_claim all answer natural-language questions, and ai_visibility_check duplicates scan_competitor_ai_presence at a smaller scale. The detailed descriptions do separate most of these by routing, mode, or output, but the currently identical beta router and the broad ask/research family create real ambiguity.
Names are all lowercase snake_case and there are coherent prefixes like polymarket_ and pipeworx_, but the set mixes imperative verb_noun names (list_subscriptions, validate_claim) with descriptive noun phrases (macro_snapshot, entity_profile, polymarket_edge_tracker) and bare verbs. The inconsistency is readable but not a single predictable pattern.
33 tools is well beyond the 25+ threshold for a coherent server, and the set spans many unrelated domains: data routing, prediction markets, memory, subscriptions, AI visibility, package scanning, and llms.txt generation. Even if each cluster has a purpose, the server is overloaded and several high-level wrappers could be consolidated.
The main clusters are well covered: memory has remember/recall/forget, subscriptions have subscribe/list/recent_alerts/unsubscribe, and company research has resolve_entity, entity_profile, recent_changes, and compare_entities. Minor gaps exist (no direct trade placement, no general web search, no account/profile management), but agents can complete most workflows without dead ends.