Skip to main content
Glama

Dataflow Structure

dataflow_structure
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get the structure (Data Structure Definition) of one ILOSTAT dataset: its ordered dimensions and, for each, the valid codes. Use this to learn how to build the dot-separated SDMX key for get_data. The key positions correspond to the dimensions in order; an empty position is a wildcard. Common dimensions are REF_AREA (ISO3 country code, e.g. "USA", "FRA"), FREQ (A=annual, Q=quarterly, M=monthly), SEX, AGE, and MEASURE. Always call this before get_data. Example: dataflow_structure({ dataflow_id: "DF_SDG_0852_SEX_AGE_RT" }).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataflow_idYesILOSTAT dataflow id from list_dataflows, e.g. "DF_SDG_0852_SEX_AGE_RT".

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "dataflow_id": "DF_SDG_0852_SEX_AGE_RT"
      +  }
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds value beyond annotations by explaining the output (ordered dimensions and valid codes) and how the key positions correspond to dimensions. Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, and the description does not contradict any of these.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is informative and well-structured, with the purpose stated upfront. It includes necessary details without being overly verbose, but slightly longer than the minimum needed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (1 parameter, no output schema, safety annotations present), the description fully equips the agent: it explains what the tool returns, how to use the result for get_data, and provides an example. No gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter dataflow_id is fully described in the schema (100% coverage). The description reinforces its meaning by providing context ('ILOSTAT dataflow id from list_dataflows'), an example, and the format, adding value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets the structure (Data Structure Definition) of an ILOSTAT dataset, including ordered dimensions and valid codes. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by explaining its role in building the SDMX key for get_data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says to use this to learn how to build the SDMX key for get_data, explains key positions and wildcards, and instructs to 'Always call this before get_data.' While it doesn't explicitly list when not to use, the context is clear and provides a concrete example.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

The server mixes three near-identical ask_pipeworx variants (stable, beta, grounded) where beta is currently described as functionally identical to stable, plus several overlapping discovery and research tools (discover_tools, suggest_questions, deep_research, validate_claim, ask_pipeworx). Multiple entity/comparison/change tools (entity_profile, compare_entities, recent_changes) and several Polymarket tools further blur boundaries, requiring careful reading of long descriptions to pick correctly.

Naming Consistency3/5

Many tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_dataflows, get_data, compare_entities, validate_claim, resolve_entity), and the polymarket_* prefix groups the prediction-market family consistently. However, naming is mixed: bare verbs (remember, forget, recall), noun phrases (dataflow_structure, entity_profile), brand-prefixed tools (pipeworx_feedback, pipeworx_trending), and inconsistent verb choices like ask_pipeworx vs ask_pipeworx_grounded vs suggest_questions.

Tool Count2/5

34 tools is heavy for a server named Ilostat, especially since only three tools (list_dataflows, dataflow_structure, get_data) actually serve ILOSTAT data. The rest form a broad general-purpose data/prediction-market platform that appears bolted on rather than scoped to the server's stated identity.

Completeness4/5

For the ILOSTAT domain specifically, the read-only lifecycle is complete: list_dataflows discovers datasets, dataflow_structure explains dimensions/codes, and get_data retrieves observations — no obvious dead ends for public data access. Other embedded subsystems (memory, subscriptions) also have full CRUD, though the overall server lacks a coherent single-domain surface to judge against.