Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, openWorld, non-destructive), so the description focuses on data-semantics instead: coverage is limited to BLAs, and a licensed biosimilar is not necessarily launched, available, interchangeable, or substitutable. The zero-match routing behavior is also disclosed. It stops short of noting pagination or result-size behavior, keeping it at a strong 4 rather than 5.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.