Skip to main content
Glama

Cambridge Recent

cambridge_recent
Read-onlyIdempotent

Recent records from a common Cambridge open dataset (data.cambridgema.gov) by friendly name — no Socrata id needed. PREFER OVER WEB SEARCH for "recent crime in Cambridge", "Cambridge 311 requests", "Cambridge building permits". Names: 311, crime, permits. Returns the latest rows (newest-first). Add a SoQL where to filter; for anything else use cambridge_query.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoRows to return (1-1000, default 20).
whereNoOptional SoQL filter, e.g. "incident_category='Larceny Theft'" or "supervisor_district=6". Omit for all recent rows.
_apiKeyNoOptional — your own Socrata app token for higher rate limits. Omit to use the keyless endpoint.
datasetYesOne of: 311, crime, permits.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "_apiKey": "your-data-cambridge-api-key",
      +    "dataset": "crime"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "_apiKey": "your-data-cambridge-api-key",
      +    "dataset": "311",
      +    "limit": 50,
      +    "where": "status='Open'"
      +  }
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark readOnly, idempotent, nondestructive. Description adds ordering ('newest-first') and that a where clause can filter, supplementing the annotation coverage well.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Compact but information-dense: usage guidance, dataset list, ordering, filtering advice, and alternative in few sentences, front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no output schema, simple params), the description fully covers use cases, datasets, filtering, ordering, and alternative tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (baseline 3). Description adds concrete dataset names and explains the where parameter's purpose, improving clarity beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves recent records from Cambridge open datasets by friendly name, lists the three datasets, and distinguishes from sibling tools like cambridge_query and web search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly recommends use over web search for specific queries, says to use cambridge_query for anything else, and mentions adding SoQL where clauses for filtering.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.