Skip to main content
Glama

Dart Kr

by io.github.pipeworx-io

Dart Company Info

dart_company_info
Read-onlyIdempotent

Basic profile for a Korean DART-registered company: corp_name (Korean + English), KRX stock_code if listed, CEO name, market tier (KOSPI/KOSDAQ/KONEX/etc.), industry code, address, founding date, fiscal-year-end month, homepage. Use after dart_search_filings to enrich a corp_code into a readable entity, or as the first lookup when an agent is given a corp_code with no other context.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
corp_codeYesRequired 8-digit DART corp identifier.

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, covering safety and behavior. The description adds value by listing the returned fields and the purpose, which complements the annotations without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences. The first sentence lists the fields, and the second provides usage guidance. Every sentence is necessary and well-structured, front-loading the most important information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, the description lists all expected return fields (corp_name, stock_code, CEO, market tier, industry code, address, founding date, fiscal-year-end month, homepage), making the output clear. It also provides usage context, making it complete for a simple lookup tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes the parameter (8-digit DART corp identifier) with 100% coverage. The description adds context by explaining that the corp_code typically comes from dart_search_filings, which is useful for understanding parameter origin, but does not add new syntax or constraints beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns a basic profile for a Korean DART-registered company and lists the specific fields (corp_name, stock_code, CEO, market tier, etc.). It also distinguishes from siblings by noting it is used after dart_search_filings to enrich corp_code or as a first lookup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells when to use the tool: after dart_search_filings to enrich a corp_code into a readable entity, or as the first lookup when given a corp_code with no context. This provides clear guidance and suggests alternatives (other tools for financials, etc.).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Dart Kr toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools overlap heavily: ask_pipeworx_beta deliberately matches ask_pipeworx exactly right now, discover_tools and suggest_questions both serve as what-can-I-do entry points, and ai_visibility_check is just the single-entity version of scan_competitor_ai_presence. An agent will struggle to pick the right variant without carefully reading long descriptions.

Naming Consistency3/5

All tools are snake_case and several families share clear prefixes (dart_*, polymarket_*, ask_pipeworx_*), but the overall set mixes verb_noun (discover_tools, validate_claim), noun_phrase (entity_profile, deep_research), bare verbs (remember, recall, forget), and prefix-noun (dart_financials). Readable but not unified.

Tool Count2/5

36 tools is far above the 25+ heavy threshold, and the count is inflated by redundancy: ask_pipeworx_beta is a literal duplicate today, suggest_questions overlaps discover_tools, and ai_visibility_check is subsumed by scan_competitor_ai_presence. The broad Pipeworx platform justifies many tools, but the exposed surface is bloated.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the apparent domain well: universal querying (ask_pipeworx family + deep_research), tool discovery, entity resolution, profiles, comparisons, change feeds, claim verification, Korean DART filings, Polymarket analysis/fill-risk, memory, subscriptions, and feedback. Minor gaps remain—there's no explicit fetch-by-citation-URI tool despite claims those URIs are fetchable, and no way to retrieve full DART filing text beyond discovery.

Resources