Skip to main content
Glama

Cbs Il

by io.github.pipeworx-io

Recent Changes

recent_changes
Read-onlyIdempotent

"What's new with X" / "latest on Y" / "what happened to Z this week / month / quarter" / "updates on Acme" / "news on Tesla recently" / "what's happening with Apple" — change feed for a company in the last N days/weeks/months in ONE parallel call. Fans out to SEC EDGAR (filings since since), GDELT→GNews fallback (news mentions in window — GDELT preferred, GNews when rate-limited or 5xx), USPTO (patents granted; PatentsView API sunset May 2025 so this soft-fails until reactivated). since accepts ISO date ("2026-04-01") or relative shorthand ("7d", "30d", "3m", "1y"). Returns structured changes[] grouped by source + total_changes count + pipeworx:// citation URIs. Use entity_profile instead when you want the static profile (filings + fundamentals + LEI + patents) regardless of window.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeYesEntity type. Only "company" supported today.
sinceYesWindow start — ISO date ("2026-04-01") or relative ("7d", "30d", "3m", "1y"). Use "30d" or "1m" for typical monitoring.
valueYesTicker (e.g., "AAPL") or zero-padded CIK (e.g., "0000320193").

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains the tool's behavior in detail: fans out to multiple sources, fallback logic (GDELT→GNews), and known limitations (USPTO soft-fail). Annotations already indicate readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive, which align.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise but dense; it efficiently conveys all necessary information. Could be slightly more structured (e.g., bullet points) but no extraneous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (multiple data sources, fallback, output format), the description covers all key aspects. It mentions limitations and provides a clear alternative tool. No output schema, but the description explains the output structure sufficiently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds further meaning: explains 'since' with examples (ISO date and relative shorthand), 'value' as ticker or CIK, and 'type' constraint. Goes beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose as a change feed for a company over a time window, with specific example queries. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'entity_profile' by advising when to use each.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly provides usage context: when to use this tool (changes over time) and when to use entity_profile (static profile). Includes examples for the 'since' parameter and explains the response format.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Cbs Il toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Several tools have genuinely unclear boundaries: ask_pipeworx and ask_pipeworx_beta are currently identical in behavior, and the polymarket_edges / polymarket_arbitrage / polymarket_kalshi_spread trio all scan for mispricings with overlapping descriptions. The rich usage notes help, but they cannot fully rescue a set where two tools literally do the same thing right now.

Naming Consistency3/5

The majority of tools use readable snake_case, but conventions are mixed: verb-first names (get_index_data, resolve_entity, validate_claim) sit alongside noun-first names (catalog_browse, index_catalog, entity_profile, bet_research), standalone verbs (remember, forget, subscribe), and adjective-led names (recent_alerts, deep_research). The pattern is predictable within clusters but not uniform across the set.

Tool Count2/5

35 tools is well above the comfortable range, and the set spans many unrelated domains—CBS Israel statistics, Pipeworx data routing, Polymarket betting, memory, subscriptions, npm dependency scanning, and AI visibility checks. Even if each tool has a purpose, the surface is bloated and poorly scoped for a server named 'Cbs Il'.

Completeness4/5

For a general data-access gateway, the set covers the major workflows: routing questions, grounded verification, deep multi-source research, entity profiles, comparisons, subscriptions, memory, and tool discovery. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct raw-record fetch without routing and no keyword search over the CBS catalog, but agents can work around these.

Resources