Clan Members
clan_membersClan members.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| group_id | Yes | ||
| current_page | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
clan_membersClan members.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| group_id | Yes | ||
| current_page | No |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Input schema / examplesAdded value: +[
+ {
+ "current_page": 0,
+ "group_id": "4611686018429783292"
+ }
+]Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+ "description": "Clan members response",
+ "type": "object"
+}Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, but the description adds no behavioral context (e.g., pagination via current_page). Minimal added value beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short but this is under-specification, not conciseness. Every sentence should add value; no sentence provides useful information beyond the title.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the presence of an output schema and two parameters, the description is wholly inadequate. It fails to explain what the tool returns or how parameters affect behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description entirely omits parameter meanings. Parameters group_id and current_page are undocumented, leaving their roles unclear.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Clan members.' is a tautology of the title 'Clan Members'. No verb or resource action is stated, leaving the purpose ambiguous (e.g., list, get, update).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like 'clan'. The description provides no context on alternatives or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.