Arxiv

Get Paper

get_paper

Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetch a single arXiv paper by its ID (e.g., "2310.06825", "2310.06825v2", or legacy "cs.CL/0301001"). Returns full metadata: title, authors, abstract, categories, DOI (if linked), PDF URL.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`arxiv_id`	Yes	arXiv identifier (with or without version suffix)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`doi`	No	Digital Object Identifier if available
`title`	Yes	Paper title
`abs_url`	No	URL to abstract page
`authors`	Yes	List of author names
`comment`	No	Author comment if present
`pdf_url`	No	URL to PDF version
`summary`	Yes	Paper abstract/summary
`updated`	Yes	Last update date (ISO 8601)
`arxiv_id`	Yes	arXiv identifier
`published`	Yes	Publication date (ISO 8601)
`categories`	Yes	List of arXiv category tags
`journal_ref`	No	Journal reference if published
`primary_category`	No	Primary arXiv category

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

Changed2 schema fields changedMay 24, 2026

addedInput schema / examples

Added value: +[
+  {
+    "arxiv_id": "2310.06825"
+  },
+  {
+    "arxiv_id": "2310.06825v2"
+  }
+]

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "properties": {
+    "abs_url": {
+      "description": "URL to abstract page",
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "arxiv_id": {
+      "description": "arXiv identifier",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "authors": {
+      "description": "List of author names",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "categories": {
+      "description": "List of arXiv category tags",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "comment": {
+      "description": "Author comment if present",
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "doi": {
+      "description": "Digital Object Identifier if available",
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "journal_ref": {
+      "description": "Journal reference if published",
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "pdf_url": {
+      "description": "URL to PDF version",
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "primary_category": {
+      "description": "Primary arXiv category",
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "published": {
+      "description": "Publication date (ISO 8601)",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "summary": {
+      "description": "Paper abstract/summary",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "title": {
+      "description": "Paper title",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "updated": {
+      "description": "Last update date (ISO 8601)",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "arxiv_id",
+    "title",
+    "summary",
+    "authors",
+    "categories",
+    "published",
+    "updated"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedMay 11, 2026

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint; description adds useful detail on ID formats (version suffix, legacy) and returned metadata fields, enhancing transparency beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences front-loading key information (purpose, ID format, return fields) with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool and presence of output schema, the description fully covers input, behavior, and return values with no gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with description for arxiv_id; description adds examples and mentions legacy IDs, providing extra context for correct parameter usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verb 'fetch' and resource 'arXiv paper', and clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like search_papers by focusing on a single paper by ID.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clearly states when to use (fetching a single paper by known ID). Does not explicitly exclude alternatives but context implies it is for cases where the ID is known.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Arxiv tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.