Skip to main content
Glama

Amtrak Train Status

amtrak_train_status
Read-onlyIdempotent

Live Amtrak train status and GPS tracking — "where is my Amtrak train", "is train 6 late", "track the California Zephyr". Accepts a train number ("6", "2150") or route name ("Coast Starlight", "Empire Builder"). Returns each active instance of that train: current GPS position, speed, heading, timeliness, next station with ETA and delay minutes, and origin/destination scheduled vs actual times. Data is a community mirror of Amtrak's own tracking feed (api-v3.amtraker.com); positions update about every few minutes. Example: amtrak_train_status({ train: "6" })

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
trainYesAmtrak train number (e.g. "6", "91", "2150") or route name (e.g. "California Zephyr", "Acela", "Coast Starlight"). Via Rail ("v1") and Brightline ("b5151") trains in the same feed also work.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "train": "6"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "train": "California Zephyr"
      +  }
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive. Description adds valuable context: data is a community mirror updating every few minutes, and returns active instances. No contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single paragraph is well-structured: starts with purpose, gives usage examples, describes output, notes data source, and ends with example. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description sufficiently covers input, output, and behavior. Minor omission: no mention of handling non-existent trains or future schedules.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds examples, clarifies Via Rail and Brightline compatibility, and explains the parameter meaning beyond the schema's description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it provides live Amtrak train status and GPS tracking. Uses specific verbs like 'returns' and 'accepts', and distinguishes from sibling tools by focusing on train-level tracking rather than routes or stations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit use cases ('where is my Amtrak train', 'is train 6 late') and explains input types (train number or route name). Does not explicitly state when not to use, but the specificity makes it clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.