Skip to main content
Glama

Amtrak Station Board

amtrak_station_board
Read-onlyIdempotent

Amtrak station departures/arrivals board — upcoming trains at a station. "What trains are arriving at Chicago Union?", "next train at CHI", "station board for Denver". Accepts a 3-letter Amtrak station code ("CHI", "NYP", "LAX") or a station name ("Chicago", "Portland"). Returns trains currently en route to that station with route, scheduled vs estimated arrival, delay minutes, and status. Live community mirror of Amtrak tracking (api-v3.amtraker.com). Example: amtrak_station_board({ station: "CHI" })

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax trains to return, 1-15 (default 15)
stationYesAmtrak station code (e.g. "CHI", "NYP", "SEA") or station/city name (e.g. "Chicago", "Denver")

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "station": "CHI"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "limit": 10,
      +    "station": "Denver"
      +  }
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive). Description adds that it's a 'live community mirror' and returns trains 'currently en route' with specific fields like delay and status. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, front-loaded with purpose. Every sentence adds value. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but description explains return fields (route, scheduled vs estimated, delay, status) and provides an example call. Adequate for a read-only tool with good annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds value by clarifying station accepts both code and name, giving examples, and explaining limit range (1-15, default 15) which is not in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it's a station departures/arrivals board, gives example queries, and explains what it returns. Distinguishes from siblings like amtrak_train_status by focusing on station-level upcoming trains.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use it (upcoming trains at a station) and provides query examples. Implicitly excludes single train lookups or station info, which are handled by sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.