Skip to main content
Glama

BetaFinds

by io.github.pendurov

create_release

Create a release (version) of your startup. By default also publishes a RELEASE-type update with the notes text. After creation, upload files via request_asset_upload.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
notesNoRelease notes in Markdown
versionYesVersion, e.g. 1.4.0
announceNoWhether to publish an update in the feed (default true)
startup_slugYesStartup slug

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
messageNo
versionNo
release_idNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "properties": {
+    "message": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "release_id": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate it's not read-only or destructive, and the description adds that a RELEASE-type update is published by default, with file uploads required afterward. This is sufficient behavioral context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two sentences with no wasted words. It front-loads the main action and default behavior, then gives a clear follow-up instruction. Every sentence serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the main action, default behavior, and necessary next step (file upload). Given the presence of an output schema and accurate annotations, the description is complete for an agent to understand and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so all 4 parameters are documented. The description only indirectly references 'notes text' and does not add new constraints, examples, or clarifications beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a release (version) of a startup and distinguishes it from siblings by noting it also publishes a RELEASE-type update. This verb-resource pairing is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions the default publish behavior and the post-creation step of uploading files via request_asset_upload, but does not explicitly specify when to use this tool versus alternatives like publish_update or upload_image. The guidance is implicit rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All BetaFinds toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Every tool has a clear, distinct purpose: startup CRUD, stage management, release handling, image upload, category listing, updates, reviews, waitlist. No overlapping ambiguities.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_startup, list_categories, upload_image). No mixing of conventions.

Tool Count5/5

14 tools is well-scoped for a startup management platform. Each tool serves a specific function without redundancy, covering core workflows.

Completeness4/5

Covers the full lifecycle: create, update, stage transitions, launch, releases, file uploads, images, categories, updates, waitlist, and reviews. Missing delete startup or team management, but these are minor gaps.

Resources