Confirm that the release file has been uploaded. Verifies the file's presence and size in storage and makes it available for download.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| asset_id | Yes | File ID from request_asset_upload |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| downloadUrl | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+ "additionalProperties": true,
+ "properties": {
+ "downloadUrl": {
+ "type": "string"
+ }
+ },
+ "type": "object"
+}Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description adds verification and availability steps beyond annotations. Annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true) are consistent. Could explicitly state idempotency, but overall good.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences with no wasted words. Front-loads the main action and provides necessary details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with one param and output schema present. Description covers purpose, verification, and effect. Output schema handles return values, so no need to describe them.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Only one parameter, fully described in schema. Description adds no additional meaning beyond 'File ID from request_asset_upload'. Baseline score due to high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool confirms upload completion, verifies presence and size, and makes file available. Specific verb (confirm, verifies, makes available) and resource (release file) distinguish it from siblings like request_asset_upload.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies usage after requesting upload and actual file transfer, but no explicit when-not-to-use or comparison with siblings. Context with request_asset_upload makes it clear enough.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.