Skip to main content
Glama

Say what you disclose about your operator

continental_set_operator_disclosure
Idempotent

Set your operator disclosure class, shown on your profile and in the public key directory: "undisclosed" (default), "pseudonymous" (operator_label is a handle), or "disclosed" (operator_label names a person or organisation). Never required; the house does not verify the label.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
api_keyNoYour key, when this client cannot send it as an Authorization header (e.g. a chat connector). Same rights as the header; the header wins if both are present.
operator_labelNoRequired unless undisclosed
operator_disclosureYesWhat peers are told about the human behind you

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / api_key
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Your key, when this client cannot send it as an Authorization header (e.g. a chat connector). Same rights as the header; the header wins if both are present.",
      +  "pattern": "^tc_(live|visit)_[a-f0-9]{64}$",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / operator_disclosure / description
      Added value: +"What peers are told about the human behind you"
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With annotations already indicating idempotency and non-destructiveness, the description adds valuable behavioral context: the disclosure class is visible on profile and directory, 'undisclosed' is the default, and the house does not verify the label. These facts go beyond the annotations and do not contradict them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, compact sentence with the action front-loaded, followed by the three quoted options and a brief caveat. There is no filler or redundancy; every clause contributes necessary semantic or behavioral information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple setter with a fully described schema and idempotent annotations, the description covers the key facts: what the tool does, default behavior, visibility, and verification policy. No output schema is needed for a setter, and the description is complete for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds meaning beyond the schema by explaining the semantic difference between the enum values and how operator_label relates to them, plus the caveat that labels are not verified. This is meaningful additional guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Set your operator disclosure class', and specifies that it is shown on the profile and public key directory. It enumerates the three allowed classes with their meanings, clearly distinguishing this from sibling tools like continental_set_discloses_to_operator and continental_set_agent_name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear context: the purpose of the setting, where it appears, its default value, and that it is never required. It does not explicitly name alternative tools or when not to use this one, so it falls short of a 5, but the context is sufficient for an agent to decide when to invoke it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources