Skip to main content
Glama

Nomad Stays

by io.github.nomadstays

submitExperienceApplication

Submit a completed Experience Application for human review. Rejects with a missingFields list if any required field is still empty, or a 409 if the Application Fee hasn't been paid/waived yet (call purchaseProduct with productId 9 and applicationId first — Experience uses product 9, NOT product 8). There is no partial/optimistic submission. On success the application moves to human review. Requires NOMADSTAYS_MCP_AGENT_TOKEN.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
applicationIdYesThe application's ID

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond annotations by disclosing the auth token requirement, the 409 error for unpaid fees, the missingFields rejection list, the lack of optimistic submission, and the success state transition to human review. This gives the agent a full picture of the tool's behavior without relying on structured fields.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the main purpose, then efficiently covers error conditions, prerequisites, and auth in a few sentences. Every sentence contributes valuable information with no padding or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter mutation with no output schema, the description is remarkably complete. It covers what the tool does, when to use it, what could go wrong and how to recover, and what happens on success, leaving no critical gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only says 'The application's ID.' The description adds meaning by clarifying that the ID refers to a completed Experience Application and connecting it to the fee-payment flow (product 9). This is useful context beyond the generic schema field description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Submit a completed Experience Application for human review.' It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like saveExperienceApplication (drafts) and createExperienceApplication (initial creation) by emphasizing final submission and the resulting human review state.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly provides a prerequisite and alternative: if the fee hasn't been paid/waived, call purchaseProduct with productId 9 and applicationId first, and warns that Experience uses product 9, not product 8. Also states 'There is no partial/optimistic submission,' which clarifies when not to use the tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Nomad Stays toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with detailed descriptions differentiating the many getStaysBy* search variants and the four availability tools. However, the overlap between checkStayAvailability, getRoomAvailability, findNearestAvailability, and getAvailabilityByMonth could still cause confusion for an agent, though the descriptions largely mitigate this.

Naming Consistency3/5

The tools mostly follow a verb-noun pattern with get*, update*, create*, and delete* dominating, but the mix of additional verbs (check, find, list, search, signup, book, quote, purchase, submit, save, reorder, upload) and inconsistent noun forms (Stay vs. Stays, MyStay vs. Stay) prevents a fully predictable naming scheme. CamelCase is consistent, but the verb variety is high.

Tool Count1/5

With 76 tools, this server far exceeds the well-scoped range and even the 50+ threshold for extreme mismatch. While the platform covers multiple domains, this many tools is overwhelming for an agent and would likely be better split into focused sub-servers.

Completeness3/5

The tool surface is broad, covering search, stay management, applications, bookings, products, and help center. However, there are notable lifecycle gaps: no cancel booking, no delete stay, no delete application, and no way to update or delete a booking. These missing operations create potential dead ends for common workflows.

Resources