Skip to main content
Glama

DreamAgent

by io.github.nivethaug

dreamagent_list_projects

Read-only

List the user's DreamAgent projects.

Returns each project's name, ID, type, status, and live domain (when available). Use when the user asks to see, find, select, or check their projects — and ALWAYS before modifying a project when its ID is not already known (resolve names to IDs here first).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
statusNooptional exact-match filter (e.g. 'ready', 'failed'). During creation, projects report intermediate phases (creating/building/deploying/…), so filtering by 'creating' does not match every in-progress project.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, covering the safety profile. The description adds that it returns name, ID, type, status, and live domain 'when available', and implies scoping to the user's own projects. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, with the purpose and return fields front-loaded, followed by a high-value usage rule. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with one well-documented optional parameter and an output schema, the description provides purpose, return fields, and when-to-use. Covers all essential context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a rich description of the optional status filter, including a caveat about intermediate phases. The description does not repeat or add param-specific info, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description opens with 'List the user's DreamAgent projects' – a specific verb and resource. It enumerates returned fields and connects to user intents ('see, find, select, or check'), distinguishing it from mutation/status siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States exactly when to use: 'when the user asks to see, find, select, or check their projects' and gives a critical rule: always list first before modifying when ID is unknown. This provides actionable guidance beyond the obvious.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All DreamAgent toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: project creation, listing, status checks, edit progress, session management, and integration queries. The status tools (get_chat_status, get_edit_progress, get_project_status) are carefully differentiated by their input and purpose, so there is no real ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent pattern of 'dreamagent_' plus a verb_noun structure (e.g., create_project, list_sessions, get_edit_progress). This makes the entire set predictable and easy to navigate.

Tool Count5/5

With 12 tools, the set is well-scoped for managing DreamAgent projects and edits. Each tool covers a necessary operation without redundancy or bloat, staying comfortably within the ideal range.

Completeness4/5

The tool set comprehensively covers project creation, listing, status monitoring, AI editing, session management, and integration inspection. The notable gap is the lack of an update or delete project operation, but the core lifecycle and editing workflows are well covered.

Resources