Skip to main content
Glama

List saved searches

list_saved_searches
Read-onlyIdempotent

List the saved opportunity searches in the authenticated private workspace, including criteria, status and change counts. Does not change searches. Requires workspace Authorization headers on /mcp or account OAuth on /account/mcp; never accept keys in tool arguments.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_saved_searches"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
watchesYesEach saved search includes its ID, status, criteria and event count.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added
  2. Removed
  3. Added

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, so the bar is lower. The description still adds real context: what the response contains (criteria, status, change counts) and the auth model (workspace Authorization headers on /mcp vs account OAuth on /account/mcp, with keys never accepted as tool arguments).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three compact sentences that are front-loaded with the purpose, followed by the non-mutation note and auth requirement. 'Does not change searches' is arguably redundant with readOnlyHint, but it is cheap and reinforces safety.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter read tool with an output schema covering return values and annotations covering safety, the description supplies the remaining pieces an agent needs: workspace scoping and the transport-specific authentication requirement. Nothing material is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. There are no parameter semantics for the description to clarify, and it correctly describes a no-argument enumeration call rather than implying filter options that do not exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (List) and resource (saved opportunity searches) with scope qualifier (authenticated private workspace) and names the returned fields (criteria, status, change counts). It is clearly distinct from mutating siblings like create_saved_search and delete_saved_search, though it does not explicitly differentiate from read siblings like detail or get_saved_search_events.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the name and resource rather than stated: an agent can infer 'use this to enumerate saved searches.' The line 'Does not change searches' functions as a mild when-not hint (don't use this to modify), but no alternative is named for getting a single search's detail or its change history.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.