Skip to main content
Glama

Molt2Meet

by io.github.molt2meet-org

Join Country Waitlist

join_country_waitlist
Idempotent

Join the waitlist for a country that is not yet live on Molt2Meet (launch phase Closed, Roadmap, Alpha, or Beta). Your signup directly influences which countries we prioritize for next launch — agent demand is the primary signal we use to decide where to recruit operators next. You will be notified when the country becomes Live so you can dispatch tasks there. Use list_countries first to see available countries and their phase. Idempotent: calling again with a different country updates your country preference (one country per agent). Requires: API key from register_agent. Next: get_waitlist_status to check your position.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
apiKeyYesYour Molt2Meet API key
countryIsoCodeYesISO 3166-1 country code (e.g. 'BR', 'PY', 'DE'). Must exist in list_countries. The country must NOT already be Live — for live countries you can dispatch tasks directly via dispatch_physical_task.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes beyond annotations by explaining what idempotence means here: calling again with a different country updates preference, and only one country per agent is allowed. Also discloses the notification behavior when the country becomes Live and that signup influences launch prioritization. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with clear sequencing, but the sentence about demand signal and recruitment prioritization, while contextually interesting, is not strictly necessary for tool invocation. Still, the core instructions are front-loaded and readable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers prerequisites (API key), preparation (list_countries), the action itself, post-action status checking (get_waitlist_status), and behavioral side effects. Despite no output schema, the description effectively tells the agent what to do before and after, making the tool fully actionable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and already explains countryIsoCode constraints. The description adds extra semantics: the idempotent country-preference update and that the API key comes from register_agent, enriching the meaning of both parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: joining a waitlist for non-live countries, specifying eligible phases. It distinguishes itself from siblings like list_countries, get_waitlist_status, and dispatch_physical_task by clarifying when each is relevant.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit usage context: use for countries in Closed, Roadmap, Alpha, or Beta phases, and directs the agent to call list_countries first and get_waitlist_status next. Implicitly contrasts with dispatch_physical_task for live countries, and states the API key prerequisite from register_agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Molt2Meet toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but there are overlapping pairs like fund_wallet and checkout_wallet_deposit (both create checkout URLs for wallet top-up) and cancel_physical_task vs cancel_task_with_settlement. Detailed descriptions and cross-references help, but the sheer number of similar actions creates misselection risk.

Naming Consistency4/5

Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., get_*, list_*, approve_*). Minor deviations include inconsistent use of 'task' vs 'physical_task' in names and the awkward 'checkout_wallet_deposit', but overall the pattern is predictable.

Tool Count2/5

54 tools is excessive for any server, even a complex platform. While each tool has a role, many are redundant or could be consolidated (e.g., wallet funding tools, multiple approval/cancel variations), making the set feel bloated and hard to navigate.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the full task lifecycle, escrow/direct settlement flows, wallet management, webhooks, support, and administrative functions. The only notable gap is the inability to update task details beyond location (description, deadline, etc.) after dispatch, but core workflows are well-covered.

Resources