Skip to main content
Glama

Mirabello Immigration Intelligence

Get Processing Times

get_processing_times
Read-onlyIdempotent

Processing-time estimate for one programme (by id) or all programmes: the typical government processing range, the basis of the estimate and its source. Use when the user asks how long an application takes. Figures are indicative and vary with the case and the workload of the authority.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_processing_times"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoProgramme id as returned by list_programmes (e.g. "dominica-cbi", "greece-gv") or an unambiguous name ("Dominica", "Portugal golden visa"); an ambiguous name returns the candidates.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNo
termsNo
sourceNo
book_urlNo
providerNo
disclaimerNo
data_updatedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed9 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / id / description
      Previous value: -"Programme id as returned by list_programmes (e.g. \"dominica-cbi\", \"greece-gv\", \"portugal-gv\"). Not a country name and not a website slug."New value: +"Programme id as returned by list_programmes (e.g. \"dominica-cbi\", \"greece-gv\") or an unambiguous name (\"Dominica\", \"Portugal golden visa\"); an ambiguous name returns the candidates."
    • changedOutput schema / description
      Previous value: -"Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present."New value: +"Mirabello envelope; tool fields vary; error only on failure."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / book_url / description
      Removed value: -"Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data_updated / description
      Removed value: -"Date the underlying dataset was last updated."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer / description
      Removed value: -"Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / error / description
      Removed value: -"Present only when the request could not be fulfilled."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / provider / description
      Removed value: -"Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\"."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / source / description
      Removed value: -"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / terms / description
      Removed value: -"Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / book_a_consultation
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / book_url
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / source / description
      Previous value: -"Attribution for the data."New value: +"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / id / description
      Added value: +"Programme id as returned by list_programmes (e.g. \"dominica-cbi\", \"greece-gv\", \"portugal-gv\"). Not a country name and not a website slug."
    • addedInput schema / properties / id / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "dominica-cbi",
      +  "greece-gv"
      +]
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "book_a_consultation": {
      +      "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "data_updated": {
      +      "description": "Date the underlying dataset was last updated.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "disclaimer": {
      +      "description": "Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Present only when the request could not be fulfilled.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "provider": {
      +      "description": "Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\".",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "Attribution for the data.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "terms": {
      +      "description": "Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint=false and a closed world, so safety is covered. The description adds real behavioural context beyond that: the output is an indicative range with a stated basis and source, and figures vary with case specifics and authority workload. It also implies the all-programmes mode when no id is supplied. Missing only things like output granularity or pagination for the all-programmes case.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences: what it returns, when to use it, and the reliability caveat. The trigger is front-loaded right after the returned data, and no sentence repeats the name, title or schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single optional-parameter, read-only tool with full schema coverage, complete annotations and an output schema, the description covers purpose, trigger, returned content and reliability caveat. Nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline would be 3, but the description contributes meaning the schema does not: it clarifies that omitting the id yields all programmes, and that the id resolves names, not just ids from list_programmes. That said, ambiguity resolution detail (candidate list on ambiguous name) lives in the schema rather than the description, so the added value is moderate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource ("processing-time estimate for one programme (by id) or all programmes") and enumerates the returned content: range, basis and source. The scope distinction between a single programme and all programmes is explicit. It stops short of a 5 because it never names the nearest sibling (estimate_timeline, find_fastest_citizenship), so an agent comparing them gets no disambiguation from the description alone.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"Use when the user asks how long an application takes" is a clear, actionable trigger condition. It provides positive context but no exclusions or named alternatives, so it does not reach the 5 bar of stating when-not or which sibling to prefer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.