Skip to main content
Glama

Mirabello Immigration Intelligence

Passport Renewal Facts

get_passport_renewal
Read-onlyIdempotent

CBI passport-RENEWAL facts for a Caribbean/Pacific programme country (St Kitts & Nevis, Antigua & Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, St Lucia, Vanuatu): official government renewal fees (currency-primary EC$/GBP/VT with USD approximations, adult/child/lost-stolen), passport validity (adult/child years incl. Grenada adult 10-year since Jul 2024 and St Lucia 10-year since Aug 2025), typical processing, remote-renewal capability (Vanuatu requires in-person biometrics), biometric status, ECCIRA status (postponed to mid-2026, existing rules in force), the biometric/ECCIRA deadlines (e.g. St Kitts 31 Jul 2027), official source URLs, last_verified and the Mirabello /passport-renewal page. Pass country (programme id, e.g. st-kitts-cbi) for one; omit for all six. Citizenship is permanent; an expired passport is only a lapsed travel document. The St Kitts & Nevis record also carries renunciation of citizenship (statute, documents, fee structure, sources). Information, not advice.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_passport_renewal"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
countryNoprogramme id (e.g. st-kitts-cbi, st-lucia-cbi) or country alias; omit for all six

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNo
termsNo
sourceNo
book_urlNo
providerNo
disclaimerNo
data_updatedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / description
      Previous value: -"Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present."New value: +"Mirabello envelope; tool fields vary; error only on failure."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / book_url / description
      Removed value: -"Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data_updated / description
      Removed value: -"Date the underlying dataset was last updated."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer / description
      Removed value: -"Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / error / description
      Removed value: -"Present only when the request could not be fulfilled."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / provider / description
      Removed value: -"Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\"."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / source / description
      Removed value: -"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / terms / description
      Removed value: -"Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / book_a_consultation
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / book_url
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / source / description
      Previous value: -"Attribution for the data."New value: +"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "book_a_consultation": {
      +      "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "data_updated": {
      +      "description": "Date the underlying dataset was last updated.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "disclaimer": {
      +      "description": "Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Present only when the request could not be fulfilled.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "provider": {
      +      "description": "Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\".",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "Attribution for the data.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "terms": {
      +      "description": "Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, so the safety bar is low. The description adds genuinely non-obvious context: data carries official source URLs and a last_verified stamp (freshness), the St Kitts record uniquely includes renunciation content, and a domain caveat that citizenship is permanent while an expired passport is only a lapsed travel document. It does not describe result shape, though an output schema exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded and free of filler, but the opening sentence is a ~130-word run-on catalogue that would scan far better as a short structured list. Everything stated earns its place; the formatting is what costs it a point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values needn't be explained, and annotations cover the safety profile; the description fully covers scope, coverage (six countries), freshness signals and a domain caveat. The remaining gap is sibling disambiguation, which matters here given the dense cluster of programme/cost/timeline tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already documents `country`, so baseline is 3. The description adds value beyond it: concrete programme-id examples, the alias form, and the explicit omit-for-all-six default behaviour, which the schema states but the description reinforces in context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource (CBI passport-renewal facts) and enumerates the exact data returned — fees with currency basis, validity years, processing times, biometric/ECCIRA deadlines, source URLs — across six named programmes. An agent can immediately tell this apart from get_programme, get_document_checklist or estimate_timeline without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives strong invocation guidance ('Pass country ... for one; omit for all six'), but never says when to prefer this tool over siblings like get_programme, get_document_checklist or get_processing_times, nor any exclusions. Usage is implied by the content scope rather than routed explicitly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.