Skip to main content
Glama

Mirabello Immigration Intelligence

Non-Resident Banking Access

get_nonresident_banking
Read-onlyIdempotent

Includes basic_account_right: whether residents (or EEA residents) have a statutory right to a basic account; that right is not a ban on non-residents. BANK-ACCOUNT ACCESS for FOREIGN NON-RESIDENTS in a jurisdiction — two profiles: (a) non-resident individual, (b) foreign entity. Each carries the STATUTORY position AND the PRACTICAL bank appetite separately (many countries are legally open but practically closed — the two are never merged), plus typical KYC/document set, remote-opening availability, indicative minimums (bank policy, never law), timelines, CRS/FATCA notes and EDD triggers. Deepens the formation-linked banking landscape to 194-country coverage. Pass cc for one jurisdiction; omit for the covered list. Account opening is decided unilaterally by each bank — NO account opening is ever guaranteed; full CRS/FATCA transparency always. Information, not financial or legal advice.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_nonresident_banking"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ccNoISO alpha-2 country code, e.g. AE, CH, SG

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNo
termsNo
sourceNo
book_urlNo
providerNo
disclaimerNo
data_updatedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / description
      Previous value: -"Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present."New value: +"Mirabello envelope; tool fields vary; error only on failure."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / book_url / description
      Removed value: -"Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data_updated / description
      Removed value: -"Date the underlying dataset was last updated."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer / description
      Removed value: -"Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / error / description
      Removed value: -"Present only when the request could not be fulfilled."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / provider / description
      Removed value: -"Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\"."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / source / description
      Removed value: -"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / terms / description
      Removed value: -"Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / book_a_consultation
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / book_url
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / source / description
      Previous value: -"Attribution for the data."New value: +"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, and the description adds substantial domain-specific context beyond them: the legal-versus-practical distinction, KYC/document expectations, remote-opening availability, bank-policy minimums, CRS/FATCA transparency, EDD triggers, and the fact that account opening is never guaranteed. These are exactly the caveats an agent needs before relying on the output.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but appropriately sized for a multi-faceted jurisdiction tool, and most sentences carry substantive information. It is not perfectly front-loaded because it opens with a subfield detail about basic_account_right before stating the main non-resident banking purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the rich annotations, 100% schema coverage, one optional parameter, and an output schema, the description supplies ample context about scope, outputs, caveats, and invocation. An agent has enough information to call it correctly without needing more behavioral or return-value explanation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the ISO alpha-2 format of cc is already fully documented. The description adds useful semantics by explaining that passing cc returns one jurisdiction while omitting it returns the covered list, which goes beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it covers bank-account access for foreign non-residents, with separate statutory and practical positions plus KYC, minimums, timelines, CRS/FATCA, and EDD details. It distinguishes the resource from general country or formation tools by target population and content, but it does not explicitly name the closely related sibling get_banking_access, so sibling differentiation is left implicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives direct invocation guidance: pass cc for one jurisdiction and omit it for the covered list. However, it does not explicitly say when to use this tool versus get_banking_access or other banking-related siblings, and it offers no when-not guidance beyond the no-guarantee caveat.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.