Skip to main content
Glama

Get Document Checklist

get_document_checklist
Read-only

Standard document checklist for a programme application (per programme type, plus programme-specific items where published). Final list always confirmed by a specialist — varies by family composition and nationality.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
programme_idYesProgramme id as returned by list_programmes (e.g. "st-kitts-cbi"). Not a country name and not a website slug.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent only when the request could not be fulfilled.
termsNoAcceptable-use and information-not-advice terms.
sourceNoAttribution for the data.
providerNoAlways "Mirabello Consultancy".
disclaimerNoInformation, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative.
data_updatedNoDate the underlying dataset was last updated.
book_a_consultationNoURL to book a Mirabello consultation.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / programme_id / description
      Added value: +"Programme id as returned by list_programmes (e.g. \"st-kitts-cbi\"). Not a country name and not a website slug."
    • addedInput schema / properties / programme_id / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "st-kitts-cbi"
      +]
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "book_a_consultation": {
      +      "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "data_updated": {
      +      "description": "Date the underlying dataset was last updated.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "disclaimer": {
      +      "description": "Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Present only when the request could not be fulfilled.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "provider": {
      +      "description": "Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\".",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "Attribution for the data.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "terms": {
      +      "description": "Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Added

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is already known. The description adds context about the checklist varying by family composition and nationality, and that the final list is always confirmed by a specialist—this is useful behavioral information beyond the annotations. No contradiction; the added variability and confirmation details justify a 4.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with zero filler. It front-loads the core purpose in the first sentence and adds necessary variability context in the second. Every sentence earns its place, and it is highly scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple tool with one parameter, an output schema exists, and no nested objects. The description covers the tool's role, the specialist confirmation, and variability factors. Nothing critical is missing for an agent to call it correctly given the surrounding schema and annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema fully describes programme_id with an example and explicit instruction that it is not a country name or slug. The description does not add any additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a 'standard document checklist for a programme application' with details about per-programme type and programme-specific items. It is specific about the resource and scope, but it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like compliance_checklist or residence_evidence_checklist, which might also relate to checklists. This prevents a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when a programme application's document checklist is needed, but it provides no explicit guidance on when not to use this tool or how it differs from alternatives such as compliance_checklist. No alternatives are named, and there is no when-not guidance, so it does not meet the bar for a 4.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.