Mirabello Immigration Intelligence

Digital-Government Progress

get_digital_gov_progress

Read-onlyIdempotent

Per-country digital-money & identity progress relevant to wealth planning: (1) CBDC status (none/researching/exploring/pilot/launched) + type (retail/wholesale) and issuer; (2) government-issued or government-sanctioned STABLECOIN status + regulatory framework (e.g. MiCA, MAS, GENIUS Act); (3) national DIGITAL ID status (planned/piloting/operational/mandatory), legal framework, biometric/mobile, cross-border interoperability (eIDAS/EUDI) and privacy law. Each block carries provenance (confidence, verified_date, official sources); low-confidence detail is withheld as CHECK-OFFICIAL-SOURCE. Pass cc for one jurisdiction, omit for all. INFORMATION, NOT ADVICE — government status/timelines change frequently; verify the cited source.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_digital_gov_progress"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`cc`	No	Country: ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code (e.g. "PT", "AE", "KN") or its name in any of the 11 site languages ("Portugal", "Schweiz", "UAE"); input_notes shows how it was read.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`error`	No
`terms`	No
`source`	No
`book_url`	No
`provider`	No
`disclaimer`	No
`data_updated`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed9 schema fields changedOct 25, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / cc / description

Previous value: -"ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code, uppercase (e.g. \"PT\" Portugal, \"AE\" United Arab Emirates, \"KN\" St Kitts and Nevis)."New value: +"Country: ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code (e.g. \"PT\", \"AE\", \"KN\") or its name in any of the 11 site languages (\"Portugal\", \"Schweiz\", \"UAE\"); input_notes shows how it was read."

changedOutput schema / description

Previous value: -"Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present."New value: +"Mirabello envelope; tool fields vary; error only on failure."

removedOutput schema / properties / book_url / description

Removed value: -"Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case."

removedOutput schema / properties / data_updated / description

Removed value: -"Date the underlying dataset was last updated."

removedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer / description

Removed value: -"Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative."

removedOutput schema / properties / error / description

Removed value: -"Present only when the request could not be fulfilled."

removedOutput schema / properties / provider / description
```
Removed value: -"Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\"."
```

removedOutput schema / properties / source / description

Removed value: -"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."

removedOutput schema / properties / terms / description

Removed value: -"Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms."

Changed3 schema fields changedOct 8, 2026

removedOutput schema / properties / book_a_consultation

Removed value: -{
-  "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
-  "type": "string"
-}

addedOutput schema / properties / book_url

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedOutput schema / properties / source / description

Previous value: -"Attribution for the data."New value: +"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 23, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / cc / description

Added value: +"ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code, uppercase (e.g. \"PT\" Portugal, \"AE\" United Arab Emirates, \"KN\" St Kitts and Nevis)."

addedInput schema / properties / cc / examples
```
Added value: +[
+  "PT",
+  "AE"
+]
```

Changed1 schema field changedJul 27, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "description": "Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present.",
+  "properties": {
+    "book_a_consultation": {
+      "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "data_updated": {
+      "description": "Date the underlying dataset was last updated.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "disclaimer": {
+      "description": "Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "error": {
+      "description": "Present only when the request could not be fulfilled.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "provider": {
+      "description": "Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\".",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source": {
+      "description": "Attribution for the data.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "terms": {
+      "description": "Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms.",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

AddedJun 28, 2026

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, so the bar is lower; the description nonetheless adds real behavioral context — provenance metadata per block, low-confidence detail being withheld as CHECK-OFFICIAL-SOURCE, and a staleness warning that government statuses change frequently. It does not describe volume or response size when cc is omitted, which is the only notable gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the resource and segmented into numbered blocks; every sentence carries information (return shape, provenance, caveat). It is dense and long-ish for a one-parameter read tool, with some all-caps emphasis that edges toward noise, keeping it from a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value enumeration is partly redundant, but the description still supplies what the schema can't: confidence/provenance semantics, the withholding behavior, and the advice disclaimer. Only the bulk-return case (omitting cc across all jurisdictions) is left unaddressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline would be 3, but the description adds meaning the schema does not: omitting cc returns all jurisdictions, and passing it scopes to one. That default/omission semantics is genuinely useful beyond the schema's format description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific resource (per-country digital-money & identity progress) and enumerates the three exact data blocks returned (CBDC, stablecoin, digital ID) with their status vocabularies. This is far more specific than the title and is clearly distinguishable from siblings like get_country or get_regulator_registry.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"Pass cc for one jurisdiction, omit for all" gives explicit invocation guidance for the single parameter, and "relevant to wealth planning" frames the context of use. It does not name alternatives or state when another sibling tool would be preferable, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Mirabello Immigration Intelligence tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.