Skip to main content
Glama

Digital-Government Progress

get_digital_gov_progress
Read-only

Per-country digital-money & identity progress relevant to wealth planning: (1) CBDC status (none/researching/exploring/pilot/launched) + type (retail/wholesale) and issuer; (2) government-issued or government-sanctioned STABLECOIN status + regulatory framework (e.g. MiCA, MAS, GENIUS Act); (3) national DIGITAL ID status (planned/piloting/operational/mandatory), legal framework, biometric/mobile, cross-border interoperability (eIDAS/EUDI) and privacy law. Each block carries provenance (confidence, verified_date, official sources); low-confidence detail is withheld as CHECK-OFFICIAL-SOURCE. Pass cc for one jurisdiction, omit for all. INFORMATION, NOT ADVICE — government status/timelines change frequently; verify the cited source.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ccNoISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code, uppercase (e.g. "PT" Portugal, "AE" United Arab Emirates, "KN" St Kitts and Nevis).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent only when the request could not be fulfilled.
termsNoAcceptable-use and information-not-advice terms.
sourceNoAttribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself.
book_urlNoLink to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case.
providerNoAlways "Mirabello Consultancy".
disclaimerNoInformation, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative.
data_updatedNoDate the underlying dataset was last updated.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / book_a_consultation
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / book_url
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / source / description
      Previous value: -"Attribution for the data."New value: +"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cc / description
      Added value: +"ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code, uppercase (e.g. \"PT\" Portugal, \"AE\" United Arab Emirates, \"KN\" St Kitts and Nevis)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / cc / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "PT",
      +  "AE"
      +]
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "book_a_consultation": {
      +      "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "data_updated": {
      +      "description": "Date the underlying dataset was last updated.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "disclaimer": {
      +      "description": "Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Present only when the request could not be fulfilled.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "provider": {
      +      "description": "Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\".",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "Attribution for the data.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "terms": {
      +      "description": "Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare a safe read-only, closed-world profile, so the bar is lower. The description still adds real behavioral context beyond them: each block carries provenance (confidence, verified_date, official sources) and low-confidence detail is deliberately withheld as CHECK-OFFICIAL-SOURCE, which tells the agent to expect gaps rather than treat absence as 'no programme'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Dense but front-loaded: the three data blocks come first, then the cc-scoping rule, then the provenance/disclaimer. Every clause carries information, though the enumerated field lists are long and the closing disclaimer slightly restates the provenance point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the description still covers what each block contains, the confidence/withholding behavior, and the volatile-data caveat. Nothing an agent needs to call this correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema itself documents the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 format with examples, so the baseline would be 3. The description adds the omission semantics ('omit for all'), which the schema does not convey since cc is optional, and ties the parameter to the scoping behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (per-country digital-money & identity progress) and enumerates exactly what it returns: CBDC status/type/issuer, stablecoin status and regulatory framework, and national digital ID status. This is clearly distinct from siblings like get_country, get_banking_access, or get_capital_controls, so an agent can route without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Pass cc for one jurisdiction, omit for all', which is invocation guidance, and adds a 'verify the cited source' caution. However, it never states when to prefer this tool over adjacent siblings (get_country, get_regulator_registry, get_recent_changes) or when it is not the right source, so usage is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.