Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has an output schema (has_output_schema=true) and high schema coverage, the description need not detail every return field. It covers purpose, scope, source, usage, and a safety caveat. The only minor gap is lack of explicit sibling differentiation, but the detailed scope already implies its unique role. Thus, it is near complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.