Skip to main content
Glama

Mirabello Immigration Intelligence

Forced Heirship Risk

forced_heirship_risk
Read-onlyIdempotent

Forced-heirship / testamentary-freedom position for a jurisdiction: whether forced heirship exists, the reserved shares (e.g. France réserve héréditaire, Germany Pflichtteil, Switzerland reform), the freely-disposable portion, whether a spouse/children can be disinherited, and how trusts/foundations interact with reserved shares. States the default legal rules — NOT how any estate will devolve. Use ISO alpha-2.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "cc": "<cc>"
    },
    "name": "forced_heirship_risk"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ccYesCountry: ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code (e.g. "PT", "AE", "KN") or its name in any of the 11 site languages ("Portugal", "Schweiz", "UAE"); input_notes shows how it was read.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNo
termsNo
sourceNo
book_urlNo
providerNo
disclaimerNo
data_updatedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed9 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / cc / description
      Previous value: -"ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code, uppercase (e.g. \"PT\" Portugal, \"AE\" United Arab Emirates, \"KN\" St Kitts and Nevis)."New value: +"Country: ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code (e.g. \"PT\", \"AE\", \"KN\") or its name in any of the 11 site languages (\"Portugal\", \"Schweiz\", \"UAE\"); input_notes shows how it was read."
    • changedOutput schema / description
      Previous value: -"Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present."New value: +"Mirabello envelope; tool fields vary; error only on failure."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / book_url / description
      Removed value: -"Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data_updated / description
      Removed value: -"Date the underlying dataset was last updated."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer / description
      Removed value: -"Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / error / description
      Removed value: -"Present only when the request could not be fulfilled."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / provider / description
      Removed value: -"Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\"."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / source / description
      Removed value: -"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / terms / description
      Removed value: -"Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / book_a_consultation
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / book_url
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / source / description
      Previous value: -"Attribution for the data."New value: +"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cc / description
      Added value: +"ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code, uppercase (e.g. \"PT\" Portugal, \"AE\" United Arab Emirates, \"KN\" St Kitts and Nevis)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / cc / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "PT",
      +  "AE"
      +]
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "book_a_consultation": {
      +      "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "data_updated": {
      +      "description": "Date the underlying dataset was last updated.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "disclaimer": {
      +      "description": "Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Present only when the request could not be fulfilled.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "provider": {
      +      "description": "Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\".",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "Attribution for the data.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "terms": {
      +      "description": "Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  5. Added

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish that this is a read-only, idempotent, non-destructive lookup. The description adds meaningful behavioral context by clarifying that the result is the default legal rule set and not an estate-specific devolution analysis, which is a critical interpretation limit for a legal-risk tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is front-loaded with the resource scope, then adds the key caveat and parameter instruction. Every clause earns its place by clarifying what legal content is returned and what the tool is not intended to answer.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the rich annotations, complete parameter schema, and presence of an output schema, the description is complete enough for correct tool selection and invocation. It covers purpose, scope boundaries, and input format without needing to restate return-value structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the single cc parameter is fully documented in the schema, including ISO alpha-2 codes, examples, and multilingual country-name input. The description only repeats 'Use ISO alpha-2' and adds no semantic detail beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific legal resource for a jurisdiction and enumerates exactly what it covers: forced heirship existence, reserved shares, freely disposable portion, disinheritance, and trust/foundation interaction. It also distinguishes the output from estate-specific planning by saying it states default legal rules, not how any estate will devolve.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear usage context and an explicit exclusion: use it for the default forced-heirship position, not for predicting how an estate will devolve. It does not explicitly name sibling alternatives such as succession_conflict_map or matrimonial_regime_screen, so it falls short of full when/when-not/alternative routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.