Skip to main content
Glama

Find Charity Jurisdictions

find_charity_jurisdictions
Read-only

Find jurisdictions for setting up a CHARITABLE/PHILANTHROPIC structure — charitable foundations (e.g. the Liechtenstein gemeinnützige Stiftung), donor-advised funds (US 501(c)(3) ecosystem), charitable trusts, waqf — with donor tax relief, the entity tax status, cross-border granting and the standout vehicle. The philanthropy/legacy complement to the residence/citizenship + tax + trust layers.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
vehicleNoe.g. foundation, donor-advised fund, charitable trust, waqf
donor_reliefNoonly jurisdictions giving donors a tax deduction/credit

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent only when the request could not be fulfilled.
termsNoAcceptable-use and information-not-advice terms.
sourceNoAttribution for the data.
providerNoAlways "Mirabello Consultancy".
disclaimerNoInformation, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative.
data_updatedNoDate the underlying dataset was last updated.
book_a_consultationNoURL to book a Mirabello consultation.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "book_a_consultation": {
      +      "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "data_updated": {
      +      "description": "Date the underlying dataset was last updated.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "disclaimer": {
      +      "description": "Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Present only when the request could not be fulfilled.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "provider": {
      +      "description": "Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\".",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "Attribution for the data.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "terms": {
      +      "description": "Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds transparency about what results are selected or emphasized: 'donor tax relief, the entity tax status, cross-border granting and the standout vehicle.' No contradiction with annotations was found.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences and every part contributes: the main purpose, illustrative vehicle examples, output emphases, and the positioning relative to other advisory layers. It is somewhat dense but appropriately sized for a multi-faceted search tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only search tool with two optional parameters, an output schema, and strong annotation coverage, the description is complete enough. It conveys scope, selection emphasis, and how it fits into the broader tool family, leaving no critical gap for an agent deciding whether or how to invoke it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: the schema already defines vehicle with examples and donor_relief as a boolean for tax deduction/credit. The description reinforces these ideas but does not add meaningful semantics beyond the schema, so the high-coverage baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Find jurisdictions for setting up a CHARITABLE/PHILANTHROPIC structure.' It further distances itself from sibling tools by naming concrete vehicle types and positioning itself as 'the philanthropy/legacy complement' to residence, tax, and trust layers. An agent can clearly distinguish this from find_trust_jurisdictions and find_formation_jurisdictions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'The philanthropy/legacy complement to the residence/citizenship + tax + trust layers' gives clear contextual guidance about when this tool is relevant versus the trust and formation siblings. It does not explicitly list when-not-to-use cases or name alternative tools, so it falls just short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.