Skip to main content
Glama

Mirabello Immigration Intelligence

Compliance Checklist

compliance_checklist
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists the reporting/compliance obligations a stated profile may trigger — FATCA (US persons), CRS, CARF/DAC8 (crypto), DAC6 (EU cross-border arrangements), PEP enhanced due diligence, investment-migration due diligence, trust/beneficial-ownership reporting and source-of-wealth evidence. Pass boolean flags (us_person, crs_reportable, crypto_holder, dac6, pep, cbi_applicant, trust_settlor, large_cash_or_sow). STATELESS — pass only non-identifying flags, never personal data. Informational only, not legal/tax advice, not exhaustive.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "compliance_checklist"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pepNoTrue if the client is a politically exposed person, a family member or a known close associate — requires enhanced due diligence.
dac6NoTrue if a reportable cross-border arrangement under EU DAC6 may be involved.
us_personNoTrue if the client is a US person for tax purposes (citizen, green-card holder or substantial-presence resident) — triggers FATCA and US filing obligations.
cbi_applicantNoTrue if the client is applying for citizenship by investment.
crypto_holderNoTrue if the client holds digital assets — relevant to CARF and local crypto reporting.
rbi_applicantNoTrue if the client is applying for residence by investment.
trust_settlorNoTrue if the client settles or controls a trust or foundation.
crs_reportableNoTrue if the client holds financial accounts reportable under the CRS automatic-exchange regime.
large_cash_or_sowNoTrue if large cash movements or a complex source-of-wealth story are involved.
eu_cross_border_arrangementNoTrue if the structure spans two or more EU member states.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNo
termsNo
sourceNo
book_urlNo
providerNo
disclaimerNo
data_updatedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / description
      Previous value: -"Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present."New value: +"Mirabello envelope; tool fields vary; error only on failure."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / book_url / description
      Removed value: -"Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data_updated / description
      Removed value: -"Date the underlying dataset was last updated."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer / description
      Removed value: -"Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / error / description
      Removed value: -"Present only when the request could not be fulfilled."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / provider / description
      Removed value: -"Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\"."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / source / description
      Removed value: -"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / terms / description
      Removed value: -"Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / book_a_consultation
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / book_url
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Link to request a consultation with a Mirabello specialist, for a personal case.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / source / description
      Previous value: -"Attribution for the data."New value: +"Attribution for the data, when it is not Mirabello Consultancy itself."
  3. Changed10 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cbi_applicant / description
      Added value: +"True if the client is applying for citizenship by investment."
    • addedInput schema / properties / crs_reportable / description
      Added value: +"True if the client holds financial accounts reportable under the CRS automatic-exchange regime."
    • addedInput schema / properties / crypto_holder / description
      Added value: +"True if the client holds digital assets — relevant to CARF and local crypto reporting."
    • addedInput schema / properties / dac6 / description
      Added value: +"True if a reportable cross-border arrangement under EU DAC6 may be involved."
    • addedInput schema / properties / eu_cross_border_arrangement / description
      Added value: +"True if the structure spans two or more EU member states."
    • addedInput schema / properties / large_cash_or_sow / description
      Added value: +"True if large cash movements or a complex source-of-wealth story are involved."
    • addedInput schema / properties / pep / description
      Added value: +"True if the client is a politically exposed person, a family member or a known close associate — requires enhanced due diligence."
    • addedInput schema / properties / rbi_applicant / description
      Added value: +"True if the client is applying for residence by investment."
    • addedInput schema / properties / trust_settlor / description
      Added value: +"True if the client settles or controls a trust or foundation."
    • addedInput schema / properties / us_person / description
      Added value: +"True if the client is a US person for tax purposes (citizen, green-card holder or substantial-presence resident) — triggers FATCA and US filing obligations."
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Mirabello response envelope. Tool-specific fields vary; the provenance/disclaimer envelope is always present.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "book_a_consultation": {
      +      "description": "URL to book a Mirabello consultation.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "data_updated": {
      +      "description": "Date the underlying dataset was last updated.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "disclaimer": {
      +      "description": "Information, not legal/tax/financial/immigration advice; figures indicative.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Present only when the request could not be fulfilled.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "provider": {
      +      "description": "Always \"Mirabello Consultancy\".",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "Attribution for the data.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "terms": {
      +      "description": "Acceptable-use and information-not-advice terms.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  5. Added

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond that: it is stateless, requires only non-identifying boolean flags, and is explicitly 'Informational only, not legal/tax advice, not exhaustive.' These are meaningful disclosures about data handling and limitations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and then lists flags and caveats efficiently. The disclaimer sentences earn their place. It is somewhat dense but not padded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained. The description covers statelessness, privacy constraints, and the informational scope. It is nearly complete, though it could mention the two schema flags it omits from its inline list.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents each flag thoroughly. The description reinforces the mapping by naming most flags and their associated regimes (FATCA, CRS, CARF/DAC8, DAC6, PEP, etc.), but it omits rbi_applicant and eu_cross_border_arrangement from its list, so it adds only marginal value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Lists') and resource ('reporting/compliance obligations') and enumerates the regimes covered. It is clearly distinguishable from siblings like check_eligibility and get_document_checklist, which handle different screening tasks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The purpose implies when to use it (compliance obligation screening for a profile), and it gives a privacy constraint ('STATELESS — pass only non-identifying flags'). However, it never explicitly says when to choose this over alternatives such as check_eligibility or get_document_checklist, nor does it state any exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.