Skip to main content
Glama

marketplace

The official mcp.ai marketplace — the in-platform catalog of every MCP/tool, AND the way to run them. Covers capability requests like "find an MCP that does X", "consulta um CPF", "is there a tool for Y". Core flow: action=search discovers MCPs by intent → describe returns one MCP's full profile (every tool with its id + params, pricing, auth) so you pick the right tool_id → invoke RUNS that tool. KEY: invoke works even when the MCP is NOT installed — it runs the tool pontualmente (one-off), without adding the MCP to the toolkit and without bloating the tool list. If the MCP needs a credential/login, invoke returns a connect link; if it is paid and the wallet is empty, invoke returns a checkout/top-up link (the user opens it, then you retry). Use install only to make an MCP PERMANENT in the active toolkit (its tools then show up natively in future sessions); prefer invoke for a single/occasional use. list_tools lists what is callable right now. subscribe/cancel handle per-MCP billing; report_bug sends feedback; request_mcp asks us to build a NEW MCP when nothing fits. Search/describe flag installed_in_toolkit vs installed_in_workspace. Writes (install/uninstall/subscribe/cancel and the one-off install behind invoke) require workspace owner/admin. It also carries the mcp.ai PROMPT LIBRARY, which is about ready-made prompt TEXT rather than MCPs: search_prompts finds one, get_prompt returns its full text with {{variables}} filled, and publish_prompt saves a prompt and returns a shareable mcp.ai/p/ link that opens without login.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
queryNo
actionNosearch
mcp_idNo
messageNo
tool_idNo
argumentsNo{}
immediateNo
tier_slugNo
prompt_bodyNo
prompt_slugNo
prompt_toolNo
prompt_varsNo{}
conversationNo[]
prompt_titleNo
request_nameNo
cancel_reasonNo
cancel_commentNo
prompt_targetsNo
report_contextNo
prompt_categoryNo
request_detailsNo
prompt_descriptionNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed9 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "search",
      -  "describe",
      -  "install",
      -  "uninstall",
      -  "subscribe",
      -  "cancel",
      -  "resume",
      -  "report_bug",
      -  "request_mcp",
      -  "list_tools",
      -  "invoke"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "search",
      +  "describe",
      +  "install",
      +  "uninstall",
      +  "subscribe",
      +  "cancel",
      +  "resume",
      +  "report_bug",
      +  "request_mcp",
      +  "list_tools",
      +  "invoke",
      +  "search_prompts",
      +  "get_prompt",
      +  "publish_prompt"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_body
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_category
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_description
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_slug
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_targets
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": [],
      +  "items": {
      +    "enum": [
      +      "claude",
      +      "chatgpt",
      +      "cursor",
      +      "lovable"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_title
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_tool
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_vars
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "{}",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "search",
      -  "describe",
      -  "install",
      -  "uninstall",
      -  "subscribe",
      -  "cancel",
      -  "report_bug",
      -  "request_mcp",
      -  "list_tools",
      -  "invoke"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "search",
      +  "describe",
      +  "install",
      +  "uninstall",
      +  "subscribe",
      +  "cancel",
      +  "resume",
      +  "report_bug",
      +  "request_mcp",
      +  "list_tools",
      +  "invoke"
      +]
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cancel_comment
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / cancel_reason
      Added value: +{
      +  "enum": [
      +    "too_expensive",
      +    "missing_features",
      +    "switched_service",
      +    "unused",
      +    "customer_service",
      +    "too_complex",
      +    "low_quality",
      +    "other"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. Added
  5. Removed
  6. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations, the description discloses substantial behavioral context: invoke runs tools even when not installed, returns connect links for credentials, returns checkout/top-up links when paid tools have empty wallets, and requires workspace owner/admin for writes. It also clarifies that invoke is one-off and does not add the MCP to the toolkit, which is valuable side-effect information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long and dense, but every sentence contributes substantive guidance. It is front-loaded with the core purpose and follows a logical workflow order. However, it is a single unbroken paragraph with no bullet points or structural breaks, which makes parsing more difficult than necessary.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity and the absence of an output schema, the description covers most key behaviors: search/describe/invoke flow, install vs invoke, billing, permissions, prompt library, and write operations. The main gap is that the 'resume' action is not mentioned, and some parameters are never described, so it is not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It explains the central action parameter and core flow (search → describe → invoke) and references tool_id, but many parameters such as limit, immediate, tier_slug, conversation, resume, report_context, and request_details are left entirely undocumented in both the schema and description. The narrative helps with the main workflow but does not fully compensate for 23 undocumented parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool is the mcp.ai marketplace: an in-platform catalog and runner for MCPs/tools. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools (OpenFinance actions, report_bug, etc.) by positioning marketplace as the meta-hub for searching, describing, invoking, and installing MCPs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit usage guidance: 'prefer invoke for a single/occasional use', 'use install only to make an MCP PERMANENT', and 'request_mcp asks us to build a NEW MCP when nothing fits'. It also explains when list_tools, subscribe/cancel, and prompt-library actions are appropriate, giving a clear decision framework.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. The Open Finance tools are granular (e.g., list vs get vs force_sync for different resources), and the marketplace, authentication, and utility tools do not overlap. No two tools could be easily confused.

Naming Consistency4/5

The Open Finance tools consistently use the 'openfinance_' prefix followed by a verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_accounts, get_balance). Other tools (authenticate, connect, marketplace) use simple verb names, which is a minor deviation but still clear and predictable.

Tool Count4/5

25 tools is on the higher end, but the server covers a broad domain (marketplace + comprehensive Open Finance operations). Each tool serves a specific function, and the count is justified by the depth of functionality.

Completeness5/5

The toolset provides full lifecycle coverage for the Open Finance domain: list, get, sync, update, transactions, categories, investments, loans, credit cards, and connections. The marketplace tool is also feature-rich. No obvious gaps for the intended purpose.