show_version
Read-onlyIdempotent
Show the current MCP platform and adapter versions.
Input Schema
TableJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Viagens de Servidores (Transparência)
Schema Changelog
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
- First observed
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=False. The description adds the specific resource being shown but no additional behavioral details such as output format or side effects. It is consistent with the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Conciseness5/5
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the action, and contains no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Completeness5/5
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
This is a zero-parameter, read-only, idempotent tool without an output schema. The one-sentence description adequately conveys the tool's purpose and return value (version information). No further context is needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Parameters4/5
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool accepts no parameters, so the schema fully describes the input. The description does not need to add parameter information; baseline 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Purpose5/5
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses the specific verb 'show' and clearly identifies the resource ('current MCP platform and adapter versions'), making it distinct from sibling tools like authenticate or marketplace.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Usage Guidelines3/5
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool or contrast it with alternatives. However, for a simple version-retrieval tool, usage is implied whenever version information is needed.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Try in Browser
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation3/5
Several tools overlap in reporting connection and toolkit status (connect, toolkit_info, and portions of marketplace), making it ambiguous which to call. The domain-specific tool is distinct, but the platform tools blur together.
Naming Consistency2/5
Tool names are inconsistent: some are single verbs (authenticate, connect), some are noun phrases (toolkit_info, marketplace), and one is a long Portuguese phrase (transparencia_servidores_viagens_consultar). No consistent verb_noun pattern is present.
Tool Count3/5
Seven tools is an acceptable count, but the server's stated purpose about transparency is served by only one tool, with six generic platform tools that dilute the focus. The count feels high for the domain and unfocused.
Completeness2/5
The domain tool only queries travel expenses by CPF, covering a narrow slice of what the server name implies. There are no other domain operations, such as listing available datasets or querying by other criteria, so the surface is significantly incomplete.