Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description describes a destructive delete operation, but the annotations set destructiveHint to false. The [write, altera dados] tag aligns with readOnlyHint=false, but declaring deletion directly contradicts the non-destructive hint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, front-loaded with the action and endpoint, and easy to scan. The write/alteration tag is mildly redundant with 'delete', but the overall length is appropriate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutating delete operation, the description omits critical details such as how to identify the occurrence, whether deletion is permanent or recoverable, what the response looks like, and what body/query/account mean. This is insufficient for reliable invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All three parameters (body, query, account) are undocumented strings with 0% schema description coverage, and the description does not explain what each parameter should contain. An agent cannot determine how to target a specific occurrence from the endpoint alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the action 'Deletar ocorrência' and the endpoint POST /ocorrencias/delete, making the verb and resource clear. This cleanly distinguishes it from sibling occurrence tools like create, update, and list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool instead of the many sibling alternatives. The verb 'delete' implies the intended use, but there are no prerequisites, exclusions, or alternative-selection cues.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.