Skip to main content
Glama

Sicredi MCP

by io.github.mcp-dir

marketplace

The official mcp.ai marketplace — the in-platform catalog of every MCP/tool, AND the way to run them. Covers capability requests like "find an MCP that does X", "consulta um CPF", "is there a tool for Y". Core flow: action=search discovers MCPs by intent → describe returns one MCP's full profile (every tool with its id + params, pricing, auth) so you pick the right tool_id → invoke RUNS that tool. KEY: invoke works even when the MCP is NOT installed — it runs the tool pontualmente (one-off), without adding the MCP to the toolkit and without bloating the tool list. If the MCP needs a credential/login, invoke returns a connect link; if it is paid and the wallet is empty, invoke returns a checkout/top-up link (the user opens it, then you retry). Use install only to make an MCP PERMANENT in the active toolkit (its tools then show up natively in future sessions); prefer invoke for a single/occasional use. list_tools lists what is callable right now. subscribe/cancel handle per-MCP billing; report_bug sends feedback; request_mcp asks us to build a NEW MCP when nothing fits. Search/describe flag installed_in_toolkit vs installed_in_workspace. Writes (install/uninstall/subscribe/cancel and the one-off install behind invoke) require workspace owner/admin. It also carries the mcp.ai PROMPT LIBRARY, which is about ready-made prompt TEXT rather than MCPs: search_prompts finds one, get_prompt returns its full text with {{variables}} filled, and publish_prompt saves a prompt and returns a shareable mcp.ai/p/ link that opens without login.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
queryNo
actionNosearch
mcp_idNo
messageNo
tool_idNo
argumentsNo{}
immediateNo
tier_slugNo
prompt_bodyNo
prompt_slugNo
prompt_toolNo
prompt_varsNo{}
conversationNo[]
prompt_titleNo
request_nameNo
cancel_reasonNo
cancel_commentNo
prompt_targetsNo
report_contextNo
prompt_categoryNo
request_detailsNo
prompt_descriptionNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added
  2. Removed
  3. Added
  4. Removed
  5. Added
  6. Removed
  7. Changed9 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "search",
-  "describe",
-  "install",
-  "uninstall",
-  "subscribe",
-  "cancel",
-  "resume",
-  "report_bug",
-  "request_mcp",
-  "list_tools",
-  "invoke"
-]New value: +[
+  "search",
+  "describe",
+  "install",
+  "uninstall",
+  "subscribe",
+  "cancel",
+  "resume",
+  "report_bug",
+  "request_mcp",
+  "list_tools",
+  "invoke",
+  "search_prompts",
+  "get_prompt",
+  "publish_prompt"
+]
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_body
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_category
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_description
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_slug
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_targets
      Added value: +{
+  "default": [],
+  "items": {
+    "enum": [
+      "claude",
+      "chatgpt",
+      "cursor",
+      "lovable"
+    ],
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_title
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_tool
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_vars
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "{}",
+  "type": "string"
+}
  8. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "search",
-  "describe",
-  "install",
-  "uninstall",
-  "subscribe",
-  "cancel",
-  "report_bug",
-  "request_mcp",
-  "list_tools",
-  "invoke"
-]New value: +[
+  "search",
+  "describe",
+  "install",
+  "uninstall",
+  "subscribe",
+  "cancel",
+  "resume",
+  "report_bug",
+  "request_mcp",
+  "list_tools",
+  "invoke"
+]
  9. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cancel_comment
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / cancel_reason
      Added value: +{
+  "enum": [
+    "too_expensive",
+    "missing_features",
+    "switched_service",
+    "unused",
+    "customer_service",
+    "too_complex",
+    "low_quality",
+    "other"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}
  10. Added
  11. Removed
  12. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description reveals critical behaviors not in annotations: invoke works even when the MCP is not installed (one-off execution), returns connect/checkout links when credentials or payment are needed, and writes require workspace owner/admin. It also explains that search/describe flag installation status, and details the prompt library behavior. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single dense paragraph of approximately 250 words covering 14 actions. It is information-rich with every sentence contributing, but the lack of structure (bullets, sections) makes it hard to scan. It could be more concise and better organized for quick reference.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 23 parameters, no output schema, and 14 actions, the description covers most key context: the full action flow, billing/install nuances, permission requirements, and the prompt library. It does not explicitly mention the 'resume' action or describe the return schema of describe/invoke, but overall it is substantially complete for a tool of this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage, so the description must compensate. It explains the action parameter's enum values in detail and clarifies the roles of tool_id, mcp_id, prompt_slug, and prompt_vars. However, many parameters (limit, query, immediate, tier_slug, conversation, etc.) are not individually explained, leaving some ambiguity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a clear definition: 'The official mcp.ai marketplace — the in-platform catalog of every MCP/tool, AND the way to run them.' This states both the resource (marketplace) and the verbs (search, describe, invoke, install), clearly distinguishing it from sibling openfinance tools. It then enumerates the core actions, making its multi-action purpose evident.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit guidance is provided: 'Core flow: action=search discovers MCPs by intent → describe returns one MCP's full profile ... so you pick the right tool_id → invoke RUNS that tool.' It contrasts invoke vs install: 'prefer invoke for a single/occasional use' and 'Use install only to make an MCP PERMANENT in the active toolkit.' It also mentions list_tools as the way to see callable tools, and request_mcp for when nothing fits.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Sicredi MCP toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Most openfinance_* tools have clearly distinct resource-action pairs, but several pairs overlap enough to cause misselection: authenticate vs connect, openfinance_list_accounts vs openfinance_get_accounts_detail, and openfinance_list_credit_card_bills vs openfinance_get_credit_card_bill. The long descriptions help, but the monolithic marketplace tool also mixes many sub-actions that overlap with report_bug and connection management.

Naming Consistency3/5

The openfinance_* tools mostly follow a consistent openfinance_<verb>_<noun> pattern, and the utility tools are all snake_case, but the conventions are mixed: marketplace is a bare noun, connect/authenticate are bare verbs, and openfinance_provider_status/toolkit_info lack a verb prefix. The pattern is readable but not uniform across the whole set.

Tool Count3/5

At 25 tools, this sits at the top of the borderline-heavy range. The Open Finance domain justifies many of them, but the marketplace mega-tool plus several overlapping list/get variants make the set feel larger than necessary.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the full Open Finance lifecycle well: connection search/status/sync/disconnect, accounts, balances, transactions, credit card bills, loans, investments, and category correction. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct payment/transfer initiation or single-transaction detail endpoint, but these are outside the apparent read/aggregate purpose and are workable around.

Resources