Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

Omie

by io.github.mcp-dir
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

omie_update_customer

Edita um cliente/fornecedor existente (AlterarCliente). data é um JSON string que DEVE conter a chave do cadastro (codigo_cliente_omie id Omie OU codigo_cliente_integracao) + os campos a alterar (ex.: razao_social, email, telefone1_numero, endereco). Consulte antes com omie_get_customer.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "data": "<data>"
    },
    "name": "omie_update_customer"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
accountNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, which are consistent with an update operation. The description adds that the data parameter must contain the customer key and fields to change, but does not disclose potential side effects or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. Front-loaded with the action and essential format requirements, followed by a practical usage hint.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description does not specify return values, but it adequately describes input requirements and provides a prerequisite suggestion. Slightly incomplete for a complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description fully explains the data parameter: it must be a JSON string containing the customer key (codigo_cliente_omie or codigo_cliente_integracao) and fields to alter, with examples. This adds significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool edits an existing customer/supplier ('Edita um cliente/fornecedor existente'), specifies the underlying API endpoint ('AlterarCliente'), and distinguishes from sibling tools by advising to use omie_get_customer first.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly advises to consult omie_get_customer before using this tool, providing clear context for correct usage. It does not explicitly state when not to use it, but the guidance is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Omie toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources