Skip to main content
Glama

Itaú MCP

by io.github.mcp-dir

marketplace

The official mcp.ai marketplace — the in-platform catalog of every MCP/tool, AND the way to run them. Covers capability requests like "find an MCP that does X", "consulta um CPF", "is there a tool for Y". Core flow: action=search discovers MCPs by intent → describe returns one MCP's full profile (every tool with its id + params, pricing, auth) so you pick the right tool_id → invoke RUNS that tool. KEY: invoke works even when the MCP is NOT installed — it runs the tool pontualmente (one-off), without adding the MCP to the toolkit and without bloating the tool list. If the MCP needs a credential/login, invoke returns a connect link; if it is paid and the wallet is empty, invoke returns a checkout/top-up link (the user opens it, then you retry). Use install only to make an MCP PERMANENT in the active toolkit (its tools then show up natively in future sessions); prefer invoke for a single/occasional use. list_tools lists what is callable right now. subscribe/cancel handle per-MCP billing; report_bug sends feedback; request_mcp asks us to build a NEW MCP when nothing fits. Search/describe flag installed_in_toolkit vs installed_in_workspace. Writes (install/uninstall/subscribe/cancel and the one-off install behind invoke) require workspace owner/admin. It also carries the mcp.ai PROMPT LIBRARY, which is about ready-made prompt TEXT rather than MCPs: search_prompts finds one, get_prompt returns its full text with {{variables}} filled, and publish_prompt saves a prompt and returns a shareable mcp.ai/p/ link that opens without login.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
queryNo
actionNosearch
mcp_idNo
messageNo
tool_idNo
argumentsNo{}
immediateNo
tier_slugNo
prompt_bodyNo
prompt_slugNo
prompt_toolNo
prompt_varsNo{}
conversationNo[]
prompt_titleNo
request_nameNo
cancel_reasonNo
cancel_commentNo
prompt_targetsNo
report_contextNo
prompt_categoryNo
request_detailsNo
prompt_descriptionNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added
  2. Removed
  3. Added
  4. Removed
  5. Changed9 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "search",
-  "describe",
-  "install",
-  "uninstall",
-  "subscribe",
-  "cancel",
-  "resume",
-  "report_bug",
-  "request_mcp",
-  "list_tools",
-  "invoke"
-]New value: +[
+  "search",
+  "describe",
+  "install",
+  "uninstall",
+  "subscribe",
+  "cancel",
+  "resume",
+  "report_bug",
+  "request_mcp",
+  "list_tools",
+  "invoke",
+  "search_prompts",
+  "get_prompt",
+  "publish_prompt"
+]
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_body
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_category
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_description
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_slug
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_targets
      Added value: +{
+  "default": [],
+  "items": {
+    "enum": [
+      "claude",
+      "chatgpt",
+      "cursor",
+      "lovable"
+    ],
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_title
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_tool
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_vars
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "{}",
+  "type": "string"
+}
  6. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "search",
-  "describe",
-  "install",
-  "uninstall",
-  "subscribe",
-  "cancel",
-  "report_bug",
-  "request_mcp",
-  "list_tools",
-  "invoke"
-]New value: +[
+  "search",
+  "describe",
+  "install",
+  "uninstall",
+  "subscribe",
+  "cancel",
+  "resume",
+  "report_bug",
+  "request_mcp",
+  "list_tools",
+  "invoke"
+]
  7. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cancel_comment
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / cancel_reason
      Added value: +{
+  "enum": [
+    "too_expensive",
+    "missing_features",
+    "switched_service",
+    "unused",
+    "customer_service",
+    "too_complex",
+    "low_quality",
+    "other"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}
  8. Added
  9. Removed
  10. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description richly discloses behavioral traits: invoke runs one-off without bloating the toolkit, install makes MCPs permanent, writes require owner/admin, missing credentials return a connect link, insufficient wallet returns a checkout link, and prompt links open without login. This far exceeds the sparse annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single dense paragraph, but it is front-loaded with the purpose and preserves high information density. It could be improved with bullets or section breaks, yet every sentence contributes meaningful guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 23-parameter tool with no output schema and 14 possible actions, the description covers the core flows, permissions, edge cases (connect link, checkout link), and the prompt-library subsystem. It is remarkably complete for a tool of this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description is the only source of parameter meaning. It explains key parameters like action, mcp_id, tool_id, arguments, and prompt_slug through action explanations, but many parameters (limit, immediate, tier_slug, conversation, request_name, report_context, cancel_reason) remain unexplained or only inferable.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as the official mcp.ai marketplace, catalog, and execution layer. It enumerates distinct capabilities (search, describe, invoke, install, prompt library) and differentiates from sibling domain-specific tools like openfinance_* and authenticate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit usage guidance: the core flow (search → describe → invoke), when to prefer invoke over install, when install is appropriate, and how to handle credential/payment gaps. It also describes list_tools, subscribe/cancel, report_bug, request_mcp, and the prompt library, giving clear alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Itaú MCP toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

The Open Finance tools have clear list/get pairs for each resource (accounts, transactions, loans, investments, bills), but the marketplace tool is a monolith combining search, describe, invoke, install, subscribe, and prompt library actions, causing ambiguity about which action to use. Additionally, openfinance_list_transactions and openfinance_list_transactions_by_item overlap in purpose but are distinguished by scope.

Naming Consistency3/5

The openfinance_* group follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (list, get, update, force_sync, etc.), but the platform tools (authenticate, connect, marketplace, show_version, report_bug, toolkit_info) use mixed bare verbs and nouns, creating two distinct conventions. Names like openfinance_list_transactions_by_item are longer but still consistent within the group.

Tool Count4/5

25 tools is at the heavy end, but the Open Finance domain alone justifies 17 tools covering distinct resources and operations. The platform tools add 8 more, though the marketplace tool bundles many sub-actions into one, inflating the effective count. The number is borderline but not excessive given the breadth of banking functionality.

Completeness5/5

The Open Finance surface is comprehensive with list/get for every major resource, plus support for sync, status, search, categories, and category updates. The platform tools cover authentication, connection status, marketplace operations, bug reporting, version, and toolkit state. No obvious gaps or dead ends in the workflow.

Resources