Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds that this is a write/alter-data operation and mentions bulk execution, which is useful context beyond the bare annotations. However, it does not describe request/response behavior, account requirements, or any side effects beyond changing data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded, with the resource and HTTP verb stated first. The '[write, altera dados]' part is a bit redundant with the write intent and annotations, but the overall structure is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With four parameters, no output schema, and no parameter descriptions in the schema, the description needs to provide more context. It lacks the body payload shape, account implications, response format, and any prerequisites, so the agent still has significant uncertainty about how to invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries the burden of explaining parameters. It clarifies that 'id' is the URL identifier and 'ids' enables batch updates, but it does nothing for the 'body' or 'account' parameters, which are essential for invoking an update correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states this is 'Editar' (update) for 'Transportadoras' and gives the exact API call 'PUT /api/transportadoras/{id}'. This distinguishes it from the sibling create, get, list, and delete operations for the same resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use guidance is provided, such as 'use this when updating an existing carrier' versus creating or deleting one. The bulk execution note is useful but does not explain when this tool should be chosen over alternative update-related flows.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.