Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the write behavior ('write, altera dados') and bulk execution, which adds context beyond the annotations. It does not contradict the annotations (readOnlyHint=false). However, it omits potential partial-failure behavior for bulk operations, error handling, or response details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two short sentences front-load the operation and endpoint, and the bulk note is separate and clear. There is no filler or redundant content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a write-oriented tool with four parameters and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It does not describe the body format, account requirements, return values, or bulk-operation caveats. The endpoint and bulk note provide a base, but the tool remains under-specified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description needed to explain the four parameters but only clarifies 'ids'. The required 'id', 'body', and 'account' remain ambiguous, especially 'body' and 'account', leaving the agent without enough information to construct a correct request.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the operation ('Editar'), the target resource ('Campos extras vendas'), and the endpoint (PUT /api/atributos_vendas/{id}). This distinguishes it from the create/get/list/delete sibling tools for the same domain, and the bulk-support note adds further specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage through 'Editar' and provides a practical bulk-execution note ('accepts ids for batched execution'). However, it does not explicitly discuss when to choose this tool over the create/delete/list siblings, nor does it mention prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.