Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only repeats the write behavior ('[write, altera dados]') already implied by the create action and the annotations. No additional side effects, error conditions, or permissions are disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and front-loaded, but it omits essential details. While it is not verbose, it lacks structure and substance, making it minimally acceptable at best.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is too sparse to be complete. It fails to explain the purpose of the extra fields, the expected body content, or the role of the account parameter, leaving the tool contextually incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not explain the 'body' or 'account' parameters. It provides no context for what these strings should contain or how they relate to the extra sales fields, leaving the schema underdocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly indicates a create operation ('Cadastrar') for 'Campos extras vendas' (extra sales fields), matching the tool name. However, it doesn't elaborate on what these extra fields are, distinguishing it from other sales-related tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, typical scenarios, or relationships to other create tools like gestaoclick_vendas_create.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.