Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly states '[write, altera dados]' and the PUT method, reinforcing that this tool mutates data, which aligns with readOnlyHint=false. It also discloses bulk execution via 'accepts ids for batched execution', a behavior not captured in annotations. It does not describe response behavior, but annotations cover the safety profile sufficiently.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and front-loaded: it names the resource, operation, HTTP method, and bulk capability in two sentences without unnecessary filler. Every sentence adds useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters, no output schema, and no per-parameter documentation, the description is too sparse. It does not explain what 'body' should contain, what 'account' means, how the bulk mode interacts with 'id' and 'ids', or what the response looks like.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description only adds meaning for 'id' and 'ids' via the endpoint and bulk note. The 'body' and 'account' parameters remain entirely unexplained, leaving the agent without enough semantic information to construct a correct request.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the operation as 'Editar' (edit) for 'Campos extras de orçamentos' and provides the exact endpoint PUT /api/atributos_orcamentos/{id}. This distinguishes it from sibling update tools like gestaoclick_orcamentos_update by specifying that it targets extra budget attributes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions bulk support and the resource context, but it gives no explicit guidance on when to choose this tool over alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites, exclusions, or conditions for batched vs single updates. Usage context is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.