Returns connection status and URLs. When all providers are connected, returns authenticated:true and empty pending[]. When credentials are missing, returns connect_url for the toolkit and per-install URLs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare the tool as read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive. The description adds valuable context about the return states: 'authenticated:true' with empty 'pending[]' when connected, versus 'connect_url' when credentials are missing. This enhances transparency beyond annotations without contradiction.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two concise sentences that cover both success and missing-credential cases without redundancy. Every word contributes to understanding the tool's behavior.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, the description fully explains the return values for both possible states (all providers connected vs credentials missing). Given the zero-parameter simplicity, this is a complete and well-rounded description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description does not need to add parameter semantics, and no gaps exist in this area.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Returns' with a clear resource: 'connection status and URLs'. It differentiates from sibling 'authenticate' by focusing on status rather than initiating authentication, so the purpose is unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies this tool is for checking connection status, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives like 'authenticate'. No direct comparison or exclusions are provided, making the guidance only implicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose: authenticate for token login, cepim_consultar for CNPJ checks, connect for status, marketplace for discovery/running, report_bug, show_version, and toolkit_info. There is no functional overlap between tools.
Naming is inconsistent: verbs (authenticate, connect), nouns (marketplace), verb_noun (report_bug, show_version), and noun_noun (toolkit_info). The only domain tool, cepim_consultar, reverses the verb_noun pattern, breaking any coherent naming scheme.
Seven tools is moderate, but the server is named 'CEPIM' and only one tool relates to that domain. The other six are generic platform utilities, making the set feel padded and poorly scoped to the intended purpose.
For the CEPIM domain, only a single query operation exists with no additional workflows (e.g., bulk verification, historical checks). While the platform side is thorough, the CEPIM-specific surface is shallow and incomplete for a dedicated service.