Skip to main content
Glama

BV MCP

by io.github.mcp-dir

marketplace

The official mcp.ai marketplace — the in-platform catalog of every MCP/tool, AND the way to run them. Covers capability requests like "find an MCP that does X", "consulta um CPF", "is there a tool for Y". Core flow: action=search discovers MCPs by intent → describe returns one MCP's full profile (every tool with its id + params, pricing, auth) so you pick the right tool_id → invoke RUNS that tool. KEY: invoke works even when the MCP is NOT installed — it runs the tool pontualmente (one-off), without adding the MCP to the toolkit and without bloating the tool list. If the MCP needs a credential/login, invoke returns a connect link; if it is paid and the wallet is empty, invoke returns a checkout/top-up link (the user opens it, then you retry). Use install only to make an MCP PERMANENT in the active toolkit (its tools then show up natively in future sessions); prefer invoke for a single/occasional use. list_tools lists what is callable right now. subscribe/cancel handle per-MCP billing; report_bug sends feedback; request_mcp asks us to build a NEW MCP when nothing fits. Search/describe flag installed_in_toolkit vs installed_in_workspace. Writes (install/uninstall/subscribe/cancel and the one-off install behind invoke) require workspace owner/admin. It also carries the mcp.ai PROMPT LIBRARY, which is about ready-made prompt TEXT rather than MCPs: search_prompts finds one, get_prompt returns its full text with {{variables}} filled, and publish_prompt saves a prompt and returns a shareable mcp.ai/p/ link that opens without login.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
queryNo
actionNosearch
mcp_idNo
messageNo
tool_idNo
argumentsNo{}
immediateNo
tier_slugNo
prompt_bodyNo
prompt_slugNo
prompt_toolNo
prompt_varsNo{}
conversationNo[]
prompt_titleNo
request_nameNo
cancel_reasonNo
cancel_commentNo
prompt_targetsNo
report_contextNo
prompt_categoryNo
request_detailsNo
prompt_descriptionNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added
  2. Removed
  3. Added
  4. Removed
  5. Added
  6. Removed
  7. Changed9 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "search",
-  "describe",
-  "install",
-  "uninstall",
-  "subscribe",
-  "cancel",
-  "resume",
-  "report_bug",
-  "request_mcp",
-  "list_tools",
-  "invoke"
-]New value: +[
+  "search",
+  "describe",
+  "install",
+  "uninstall",
+  "subscribe",
+  "cancel",
+  "resume",
+  "report_bug",
+  "request_mcp",
+  "list_tools",
+  "invoke",
+  "search_prompts",
+  "get_prompt",
+  "publish_prompt"
+]
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_body
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_category
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_description
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_slug
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_targets
      Added value: +{
+  "default": [],
+  "items": {
+    "enum": [
+      "claude",
+      "chatgpt",
+      "cursor",
+      "lovable"
+    ],
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_title
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_tool
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / prompt_vars
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "{}",
+  "type": "string"
+}
  8. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "search",
-  "describe",
-  "install",
-  "uninstall",
-  "subscribe",
-  "cancel",
-  "report_bug",
-  "request_mcp",
-  "list_tools",
-  "invoke"
-]New value: +[
+  "search",
+  "describe",
+  "install",
+  "uninstall",
+  "subscribe",
+  "cancel",
+  "resume",
+  "report_bug",
+  "request_mcp",
+  "list_tools",
+  "invoke"
+]
  9. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cancel_comment
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / cancel_reason
      Added value: +{
+  "enum": [
+    "too_expensive",
+    "missing_features",
+    "switched_service",
+    "unused",
+    "customer_service",
+    "too_complex",
+    "low_quality",
+    "other"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}
  10. Added
  11. Removed
  12. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes well beyond the generic annotations by explaining key side effects: invoke works without installation and runs one-off, install makes the MCP permanent, auth/checkout return links for user action, and writes require admin privileges. It also discloses return behaviors (connect link, checkout/top-up link, shareable prompt link) and the installed_in_toolkit vs installed_in_workspace flags.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single dense paragraph without visual structure, mixing Portuguese ('pontualmente') with English and covering a huge amount of detail. While much information is valuable, it lacks front-loaded clarity and would benefit from bullet points or section breaks; it reads as a wall of text rather than a concise, scannable guide.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (23 parameters, no output schema, many sub-actions), the description is fairly complete: it explains the main workflow, installation vs. one-off invocation, auth/checkout behavior, prompt library, and permission requirements. It omits details on some peripheral parameters (immediate, tier_slug, conversation), but these are less central and the description covers the primary usage scenarios well.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaning to the action parameter by enumerating valid values (search, describe, install, invoke, etc.) and explains the role of tool_id in invoke. However, with 23 parameters and 0% schema description coverage, many parameters (limit, query, immediate, tier_slug, cancel_reason, prompt_* fields) are left unexplained, and the description does not explicitly map parameters to their purpose beyond the core flow.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as the official mcp.ai marketplace — a catalog of MCPs and the mechanism to run them, covering both capability discovery and prompt library functions. It explicitly describes the core flow (search → describe → invoke) and distinguishes it from sibling tools by positioning it as the central hub versus the specific openfinance/authenticate tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit when-to-use guidance: prefer invoke for one-off use, install only for permanent toolkit inclusion, list_tools for currently callable tools, request_mcp when nothing fits, and subscribe/cancel for billing. It also contrasts the prompt library use cases (search_prompts, get_prompt, publish_prompt) and notes that writes require workspace owner/admin, giving clear usage boundaries.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All BV MCP toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

The openfinance_* tools are mostly distinct resource/action pairs, but several boundaries blur: openfinance_list_transactions vs openfinance_list_transactions_by_item vs openfinance_get_credit_card_bill(include_transactions) all return transaction data, and openfinance_get_item_status / openfinance_provider_status / openfinance_list_connections all concern connection health. The monolithic marketplace tool also bundles search/describe/invoke/install/prompt-library operations, adding further ambiguity.

Naming Consistency4/5

The 19 openfinance_* tools follow a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_accounts, get_item_status, update_transaction_category), but the six platform tools break it with bare verbs (authenticate, connect) and noun-style names (marketplace, toolkit_info). The split is namespace-based and still readable, so it is only a minor inconsistency.

Tool Count3/5

25 tools is on the heavy side, but the server spans two domains: an Open Finance banking surface (accounts, bills, loans, investments, connections) and a marketplace/platform layer (auth, search, prompts, bug reporting). Many openfinance tools are necessary for that breadth, though the count is high enough to feel bloated.

Completeness4/5

The Open Finance surface is nearly complete: connections can be searched, listed, disconnected, force-synced, and health-checked; accounts, transactions, bills, loans, and investments all have read/detail paths; transaction categories can be updated. Minor gaps exist, such as no granular marketplace tools outside the monolithic marketplace tool and no single-transaction detail endpoint, but core workflows do not dead-end.

Resources