Skip to main content
Glama

Start AlpineLead Sales Agent mission

run_sales_mission

Single-tool async Sales Mission state machine.

action=start: starts a mission and returns job_id quickly.
action=status: checks the same job without starting another mission.
action=result: fetches the final result without starting another mission.

This intentionally keeps all async lifecycle operations inside ONE MCP tool so
clients that expose only run_sales_mission can still complete the workflow.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
goalNoNatural-language sales objective. Required only for action=start.
toneNoprofessional
countNo
actionNoAsync action: start, status, or result. Use start for a new mission. Use status/result with the returned job_id.start
job_idNosmj_... job ID returned by a previous start call. Required for action=status or action=result.
regionNoOptional region.
countryNoAustria, Germany, Switzerland or DACH.DACH
districtNoOptional district.
industryNoOptional target industry.
languageNoen
max_budgetNoHard cap in AlpineLead credits. The mission never intentionally exceeds this amount.
destinationNoWhere to keep/send the result: alpinelead, webhook, pipedrive, hubspot, both, or all.alpinelead
referral_idNoOptional alr_... ID returned by match_alpinelead_capability.
minimum_scoreNo
sales_kit_countNo
save_to_historyNo
include_sales_kitsNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / action
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "start",
      +  "description": "Async action: start, status, or result. Use start for a new mission. Use status/result with the returned job_id.",
      +  "title": "Action",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / goal / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / goal / default
      Added value: +null
    • changedInput schema / properties / goal / description
      Previous value: -"Natural-language sales objective. AlpineLead discovers, qualifies and prioritizes opportunities around this goal."New value: +"Natural-language sales objective. Required only for action=start."
    • removedInput schema / properties / goal / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • addedInput schema / properties / job_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "smj_... job ID returned by a previous start call. Required for action=status or action=result.",
      +  "title": "Job Id"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / properties / referral_id / description
      Previous value: -"Optional alr_... ID returned by match_alpinelead_capability. Pass it to attribute this mission to the discovery/referral source."New value: +"Optional alr_... ID returned by match_alpinelead_capability."
    • removedInput schema / required
      Removed value: -[
      -  "goal"
      -]
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / referral_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Optional alr_... ID returned by match_alpinelead_capability. Pass it to attribute this mission to the discovery/referral source.",
      +  "title": "Referral Id"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / language / default
      Previous value: -"de"New value: +"en"
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / destination / description
      Previous value: -"Where to keep/send the result: alpinelead, webhook, pipedrive, both, or all."New value: +"Where to keep/send the result: alpinelead, webhook, pipedrive, hubspot, both, or all."
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / destination / description
      Previous value: -"Where to keep/send the result: alpinelead, webhook, or both."New value: +"Where to keep/send the result: alpinelead, webhook, pipedrive, both, or all."
  6. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / destination
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "alpinelead",
      +  "description": "Where to keep/send the result: alpinelead, webhook, or both.",
      +  "title": "Destination",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  7. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond the annotations: it is asynchronous, returns a job_id quickly, and status/result calls are non-starting. It does not contradict the annotations, and it clarifies the state-machine lifecycle that the annotations alone would not convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact, front-loaded with the core state-machine concept, and uses a short action list plus a one-sentence rationale. Every sentence earns its place with no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The start/status/result workflow is adequately explained and the output schema covers return-value expectations. It does not mention authentication prerequisites or explicitly route around sibling status/result tools, but for a complex 17-parameter tool with a rich schema the core execution model is clear enough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 59% schema coverage and 17 parameters, the description should compensate for the gaps, but it only restates action/job_id semantics already present in the schema. Several parameters (tone, count, language, minimum_score, sales_kit_count, save_to_history, include_sales_kits) remain undocumented in both the schema and the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool is an async state machine for sales missions and enumerates the start/status/result actions. It conveys a specific verb and resource, but it does not explicitly name or contrast the overlapping sibling tools check_sales_mission_status and get_sales_mission_result, so some sibling differentiation is left implicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives explicit per-action guidance: use start for a new mission, status/result for an existing job, and emphasizes that status/result do not start another mission. It does not directly explain when to choose this unified tool over the sibling status/result tools, so it stops short of full alternative routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

C2.4/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Several tools overlap or duplicate: run_sales_mission intentionally duplicates check_sales_mission_status and get_sales_mission_result, and there are multiple capability/routing tools (get_capabilities, match_alpinelead_capability, get_alpinelead_recommendation_packet, recommend_next_tool) with similar purposes. Blank descriptions for several nexus_* tools make their boundaries even harder for an agent to determine.

Naming Consistency2/5

All names use snake_case, but there is no consistent verb_noun pattern. The set mixes prefixed families (agentpub_*, nexus_*, predictive_*_info), noun-only names (winning_pattern, learning_engine), reversed noun_verb names (radar_check, hunter_run), and get/check/run/status variants for closely related operations.

Tool Count1/5

56 tools is far beyond a well-scoped server surface. Many are one-off info, status, or diagnostic tools that could be consolidated into parameterized tools. This places an excessive routing burden on the agent and dilutes the core sales workflow.

Completeness3/5

The core lead-to-CRM workflow is fairly complete: discovery, analysis, qualification, sales kit generation, HubSpot push, and learning/feedback loops are covered. However, there are notable gaps such as no way to list or retrieve saved analyses, no explicit stop/cancel for Hunter or Sales Mission runs, and no update/cancel operations for Nexus tasks.

Resources