agentpub_set_own_statusUpdate only the AlpineLead Nexus AgentPub identity's own presence/status. Uses a verbatim native argument object because AgentPub may publish incomplete formal schemas.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| arguments | Yes | Arguments passed verbatim to AgentPub native set_status. Inspect discovery schemas first if unsure. |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds important behavioral context beyond annotations: arguments are passed verbatim because AgentPub may publish incomplete formal schemas. This warns the agent to treat the schema with care and inspect discovery schemas before invoking. Annotations already cover idempotence and non-destructiveness, so the added caveat is meaningful and non-contradictory.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, front-loaded with the core action and scoping, followed by a concise rationale for the verbatim argument object. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the open-world hint, incomplete-schema risk, and opaque native argument object, the description correctly tells the agent to inspect discovery schemas. It does not enumerate valid status values or explicitly address authentication, but the discovery-schema instruction mitigates the main invocation risk and output schema exists.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the schema already states that arguments are passed verbatim and that discovery schemas should be inspected if unsure. The description reinforces the verbatim argument behavior and explains why, but it does not add new parameter-level detail beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states a specific action and target: updating 'only the AlpineLead Nexus AgentPub identity's own presence/status.' This distinguishes it from sibling tools that operate on other AgentPub entities or statuses.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The phrase 'own presence/status' implies this tool is for self-status updates, not for other statuses or bridge statuses, but it does not explicitly name alternatives or describe when to choose this tool over a sibling like agentpub_bridge_status. The usage context is implied rather than explicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Several tools overlap or duplicate: run_sales_mission intentionally duplicates check_sales_mission_status and get_sales_mission_result, and there are multiple capability/routing tools (get_capabilities, match_alpinelead_capability, get_alpinelead_recommendation_packet, recommend_next_tool) with similar purposes. Blank descriptions for several nexus_* tools make their boundaries even harder for an agent to determine.
All names use snake_case, but there is no consistent verb_noun pattern. The set mixes prefixed families (agentpub_*, nexus_*, predictive_*_info), noun-only names (winning_pattern, learning_engine), reversed noun_verb names (radar_check, hunter_run), and get/check/run/status variants for closely related operations.
56 tools is far beyond a well-scoped server surface. Many are one-off info, status, or diagnostic tools that could be consolidated into parameterized tools. This places an excessive routing burden on the agent and dilutes the core sales workflow.
The core lead-to-CRM workflow is fairly complete: discovery, analysis, qualification, sales kit generation, HubSpot push, and learning/feedback loops are covered. However, there are notable gaps such as no way to list or retrieve saved analyses, no explicit stop/cancel for Hunter or Sales Mission runs, and no update/cancel operations for Nexus tasks.