Skip to main content
Glama

List mdedit Workspaces

list_workspaces
Read-onlyIdempotent

List the mdedit workspaces available to this app without returning document content. If setup is returned, show its link and ask the user to approve workspace access before creating a document.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contextYesDescribe the user's underlying goal in one sentence. Do not include private document content, credentials, or personal information.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
setupNo
workspacesYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / setup
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "action": {
      +      "const": "update_workspace_access",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "requiresHumanApproval": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "url": {
      +      "format": "uri",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "action",
      +    "message"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
    • addedInput schema / properties / context
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Describe the user's underlying goal in one sentence. Do not include private document content, credentials, or personal information.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "context"
      +]
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and non-destructive behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely new context: document content is excluded from the result and a 'setup' element may require a user-approval step, which is behavior an agent cannot infer from the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no filler, and the core action is front-loaded ahead of the conditional workflow instruction. Every clause carries information the agent needs.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need not be explained, and the description still flags the notable 'setup' branch. Combined with full param coverage and rich annotations, an agent has what it needs, though the relationship to document-creation tools could be spelled out more.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single 'context' parameter is fully documented in the schema, including the privacy warning. The description adds nothing about the parameter, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List the mdedit workspaces') and scopes it with 'available to this app without returning document content.' No sibling tool lists workspaces, so there is nothing to differentiate against, but the scope is precise and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a clear conditional workflow: if setup is returned, surface its link and ask the user to approve access before creating a document, which implicitly positions this as a prerequisite call. It does not name any alternative tool or state when not to call it, so it stops short of full routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources