Skip to main content
Glama

ai_video_editor_create_video

What this API does

Create the same Video Editor you can make in the browser, but programmatically, so you can automate it, run it at scale, or connect it to your own app or workflow.

Good for

  • Automation and batch processing

  • Adding video editor into apps, pipelines, or tools

How it works (3 steps)

  1. Upload your inputs (video, image, or audio) with Generate Upload URLs and copy the file_path.

  2. Send a request to create a video editor job with the basic fields.

  3. Check the job status until it's complete, then download the result from downloads.

Key options

  • Inputs: usually a file, sometimes a YouTube link, depending on project type

  • Resolution: free users are limited to 576px; higher plans unlock HD and larger sizes

  • Extra fields: e.g. face_swap_mode, start_seconds/end_seconds, or a text prompt

Cost
Credits are only charged for the frames that actually render. You'll see an estimate when the job is queued, and the final total after it's done.

For detailed examples, see the product page.

MCP guidance:

  • This starts an async video generation job and returns id plus credits_charged immediately. If the user wants the finished result, call the wait_for_video_project helper with the returned id, or poll the matching GET /v1/video-projects/{id} endpoint until status is complete, error, or canceled. Completed projects include downloads with direct URLs. The custom wait helper also returns exact_download_urls separately from expiration metadata.

  • For *_file_path values, prefer an existing Magic Hour file path or a file_path returned by the upload-URL endpoint after the file bytes are uploaded. Direct public media URLs may work when they are stable, fetchable, and return raw file bytes, but hotlinked URLs can fail; when in doubt, use the presigned upload flow first and pass the returned file_path.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoGive your video a custom name for easy identification.Video Editor - dateTime
modelNoEditing model. Defaults to `ltx-2.3` for free tier and `gemini-omni-1.1` for paid. `gemini-omni` is deprecated; use `gemini-omni-1.1` instead.
styleYes
assetsYesProvide the assets for video editing.
contextNoExplain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as "a user", "the customer", or "an account". Example: "Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution."
resolutionNoOutput resolution. Defaults to `480p` for free tier and `720p` for paid. `gemini-omni-1.1` and deprecated `gemini-omni` support 720p and 1080p; LTX-2.3 supports 480p, 720p, and 1080p.
end_secondsYesEnd time of your clip in seconds. Must be greater than `start_seconds`. Minimum duration depends on model: `gemini-omni-1.1`: 3s, `ltx-2.3`: 0.5s. Maximum duration depends on model: `gemini-omni-1.1`: 10s, `ltx-2.3`: 45s.
start_secondsNoStart time of your clip (seconds). Must be ≥ 0.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesUnique ID of the video. Use it with the [Get video Project API](https://docs.magichour.ai/api-reference/video-projects/get-video-details) to fetch status and downloads.
credits_chargedYesThe amount of credits deducted from your account to generate the video. If the status is not 'complete', this value is an estimate and may be adjusted upon completion based on the actual FPS of the output video. If video generation fails, credits will be refunded, and this field will be updated to include the refund.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / context
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Explain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as \"a user\", \"the customer\", or \"an account\". Example: \"Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution.\"",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / end_seconds / description
      Previous value: -"End time of your clip in seconds. Must be greater than `start_seconds`. Minimum duration depends on model: `gemini-omni`: 3s, `ltx-2.3`: 0.5s. Maximum duration depends on model: `gemini-omni`: 10s, `ltx-2.3`: 45s."New value: +"End time of your clip in seconds. Must be greater than `start_seconds`. Minimum duration depends on model: `gemini-omni-1.1`: 3s, `ltx-2.3`: 0.5s. Maximum duration depends on model: `gemini-omni-1.1`: 10s, `ltx-2.3`: 45s."
    • changedInput schema / properties / model / description
      Previous value: -"Editing model. Defaults to `ltx-2.3` for free tier and `gemini-omni` for paid. Use `ltx-2.3` for LTX video edit."New value: +"Editing model. Defaults to `ltx-2.3` for free tier and `gemini-omni-1.1` for paid. `gemini-omni` is deprecated; use `gemini-omni-1.1` instead."
    • changedInput schema / properties / model / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "gemini-omni",
      -  "ltx-2.3"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "gemini-omni-1.1",
      +  "gemini-omni",
      +  "ltx-2.3"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / model / example
      Previous value: -"gemini-omni"New value: +"gemini-omni-1.1"
    • changedInput schema / properties / resolution / description
      Previous value: -"Output resolution. Defaults to `480p` for free tier and `720p` for paid. Google Omni supports 720p only; LTX-2.3 supports 480p, 720p, and 1080p."New value: +"Output resolution. Defaults to `480p` for free tier and `720p` for paid. `gemini-omni-1.1` and deprecated `gemini-omni` support 720p and 1080p; LTX-2.3 supports 480p, 720p, and 1080p."
  3. First observed

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations to lean on, the description carries the full burden and does so well: it discloses that this starts an async job returning id plus credits_charged immediately, lists terminal states (complete/error/canceled), explains that downloads contain direct URLs and that the wait helper returns exact_download_urls separately from expiration metadata, and describes the cost model (charged only for rendered frames, estimate at queue time, final total after completion).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well structured and front-loaded with headers ('What this API does', 'How it works', 'Key options', 'Cost', MCP guidance), so an agent can scan it quickly. It is longer than strictly necessary for a tool definition, with product-page links and marketing phrasing that are only marginally useful, but nothing is egregiously redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given an output schema exists, the description correctly does not need to spell out return fields, and it fills the genuine gaps instead: the presigned upload prerequisite for *_file_path values, the async job lifecycle, and the wait helper. It stops short of documenting failure handling or whether hotlinked URL failures are recoverable, but the coverage is strong for a tool of this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 88%, so the schema already documents nearly every parameter, making 3 the correct baseline. The description adds useful context about input types (file vs YouTube link) and names start_seconds/end_seconds and a text prompt, but its claim that free users are limited to '576px' does not match the 480p/720p/1080p enum, creating minor confusion rather than added precision.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: programmatically create the same Video Editor available in the browser, with the prompt-driven edit intent conveyed via the style field. It is clear on its own, but it never contrasts itself with the many neighboring video-creation tools (video_to_video_create_video, text_to_video_create_video, character_replace_create_video), so an agent must infer which video sibling applies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The 'Good for' bullets (automation, batch processing, embedding in apps) and the 3-step workflow imply when this tool fits, and the MCP guidance routes follow-up to wait_for_video_project or the GET endpoint. However, there is no explicit when-to-use versus the other create_video siblings, which is the key selection decision for an agent in this catalog.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.