Skip to main content
Glama

search_vacation_rental_market

Read-only

Search lilo's market discovery for vacation rental properties in any US location. Filter by price range, bedrooms, superhost status, and World Cup 2026 host cities. Returns property listings including non-activated properties for market research.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax results (default 20)
locationYesCity, state, or neighborhood to search
max_priceNoMaximum nightly price
min_priceNoMinimum nightly price
min_bedroomsNoMinimum bedrooms
superhost_onlyNoOnly show superhosts
world_cup_cityNoOnly World Cup 2026 host cities

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful behavioral context by noting it returns non-activated properties, which is a distinctive behavior not obvious from annotations or schema. It also mentions the geographic scope and filter categories.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only two sentences, front-loading the core purpose and then summarizing filters and return type. Every sentence adds value with no fluff or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 7 parameters and no output schema, but the description covers the essential return type (property listings including non-activated) and key filters. It does not describe pagination or exact listing fields, but for a search tool with well-documented schema, it is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters have meaningful descriptions. The tool description maps some filters (price range, bedrooms, superhost, World Cup city) to parameters but does not provide additional meaning beyond the schema, such as format or edge cases. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches 'lilo's market discovery for vacation rental properties' with specific filters (price range, bedrooms, superhost, World Cup 2026 host cities) and returns listings including non-activated properties. This distinguishes it from sibling search tools like search_vacation_rentals and search_world_cup_rentals by focusing on market discovery for research.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for market research by highlighting 'non-activated properties for market research' and 'market discovery'. It gives clear context on when to use it (for research on vacation rental market) but does not explicitly state when not to use it or provide alternative tool names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

There is significant overlap and redundancy among tools, causing ambiguity. For example, analyze_booking_threat_risk, analyze_guest_communication_risk, and analyze_guest_interaction_risk are aliases or near-duplicates, and multiple tools like get_vacation_rental_details and fetch_vacation_rental_details appear to serve the same purpose. This makes it difficult for an agent to choose the correct tool without confusion.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., check_vacation_rental_availability_and_pricing, get_vacation_rental_details), which aids readability. However, there are minor deviations, such as some tools using 'analyze' vs. 'assess' or 'detect' for similar risk functions, and a few tools like 'ingest_philadelphia_public_records' use a different verb style, but overall the naming is largely predictable.

Tool Count2/5

With 67 tools, the count is excessive for a vacation rental server, leading to bloat and potential overwhelm. Many tools could be consolidated (e.g., multiple risk analysis tools, duplicate property detail fetchers), and the scope feels unfocused, including niche tools like those for Philadelphia events or World Cup compliance that might be better handled as parameters in broader tools.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for the vacation rental domain, including booking, risk assessment, compliance, maintenance, evidence management, and guest interactions. There are no obvious gaps; it supports full CRUD/lifecycle operations and specialized workflows, ensuring agents can handle most scenarios without dead ends.

Resources