Skip to main content
Glama

prediction_positions

Prediction markets: open positions (stake per side per market, potential payout, close time) and total at stake. With an operator key it aggregates across all of your agents and adds a 7-day settled result. REQUIRES AGENT OR OPERATOR KEY.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "prediction_positions"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and does real work: it declares the auth requirement (agent or operator key) and a behavior change by credential — operator keys aggregate across all agents and add a 7-day settled result. It omits failure modes (e.g. what happens with a bad/expired key) and any rate-limit context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with the payload front-loaded and the auth requirement last in caps, which is easy to scan. The phrasing is heavily compressed ('adds a 7-day settled result') and the parenthetical list is dense, but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless read tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description supplies what structured fields cannot: the shape of the returned data and the key-dependent behavior. Only error/permission edge cases are left unaddressed, which is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; there is no argument surface that needs explaining. The description correctly avoids inventing parameters and instead spends its words on payload and auth.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb-resource pair ('open positions' in prediction markets) and enumerates the payload (stake per side, potential payout, close time, total at stake). It never names how it differs from the adjacent prediction_my_bets sibling, so the agent must infer the open-vs-settled split.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: the tool is for checking currently open exposure. It gives no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and no routing to prediction_my_bets, though the operator-key sentence does clarify scope in the multi-agent case.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.