Skip to main content
Glama

get_info

Get service information including version, status, limits, supported features and the current platform_fees schedule (percent and minimum per action). No API key required — works before registering.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_info"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden and does so reasonably: it discloses that the call is unauthenticated and pre-registration, and that it returns a live fee schedule. It says nothing about rate limiting or caching on this endpoint, which would matter for an agent polling it.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with the payload contents front-loaded and the auth exemption as a closing qualifier. Nothing is padded, though the enumerated list of returned fields is a touch dense to parse in one pass.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so the description must convey the return shape, and it does name the major sections including the percent-and-minimum fee structure. It stops short of naming the actual field keys, so an agent still has to inspect the response to use it programmatically.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; there is no parameter surface the description needs to compensate for.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a concrete verb (get) and resource (service information) and enumerates exactly what is returned: version, status, limits, supported features, and the platform_fees schedule. It could go one step further and distinguish itself from near siblings like get_rate_limits and whoami, since 'limits' and account context overlap.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The clause 'No API key required — works before registering' is a real usage cue: it tells the agent this is the correct call at bootstrap, before other tools become usable. It does not name alternatives for the overlapping rate-limit and identity lookups, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.